Clinical feasibility and image quality assessment of deep learning-based virtual contrast enhancement from photon-counting computed tomography

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of deep learning-based virtual contrast-enhanced (VCE) images generated from photon-counting CT (PCCT) datasets. Material and Methods: Forty consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced PCCT were retrospectively included and divided into training ( n = 20) and testing ( n = 20) cohorts. A supervised U-Net-based convolutional neural network was trained to generate VCE images from virtual non-contrast inputs, using true contrast-enhanced (TC) images as the reference. Quantitative similarity was assessed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Qualitative evaluation was performed independently by two radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale across thoracic and abdominal structures, with assessment of exact, ±1-point, and diagnostic agreement. Results: Quantitative analysis demonstrated high similarity between VCE and TC images, with very high SSIM and PSNR values and low MAE, while MSE showed a right-skewed distribution. Qualitatively, VCE images were consistently rated lower than TC images. However, central thoracic vascular structures, cardiac chambers, and mediastinal lymph nodes were frequently rated as diagnostic (Likert ≥3) with high diagnostic agreement. In contrast, abdominal solid organs and vessels were often judged non-diagnostic, mainly due to heterogeneous enhancement and apparent contrast defects. Conclusion: The synthesis of VCE images from PCCT datasets is feasible and shows excellent quantitative similarity to TC images, with promising results for thoracic applications but limited reliability for abdominal evaluation at this stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jcis_99_2026
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Clinical feasibility and image quality assessment of deep learning-based virtual contrast enhancement from photon-counting computed tomography

Julien G Cohen, Pierre‐Alexandre Poletti, Joël Valentin Stadelmann, David Leite-Arada
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Clinical feasibility and image quality assessment of deep learning-based virtual contrast enhancement from photon-counting computed tomography

Julien G Cohen, Pierre‐Alexandre Poletti, Joël Valentin Stadelmann, David Leite-Arada
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of deep learning-based virtual contrast-enhanced (VCE) images generated from photon-counting CT (PCCT) datasets. Material and Methods: Forty consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced PCCT were retrospectively included and divided into training ( n = 20) and testing ( n = 20) cohorts. A supervised U-Net-based convolutional neural network was trained to generate VCE images from virtual non-contrast inputs, using true contrast-enhanced (TC) images as the reference. Quantitative similarity was assessed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Qualitative evaluation was performed independently by two radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale across thoracic and abdominal structures, with assessment of exact, ±1-point, and diagnostic agreement. Results: Quantitative analysis demonstrated high similarity between VCE and TC images, with very high SSIM and PSNR values and low MAE, while MSE showed a right-skewed distribution. Qualitatively, VCE images were consistently rated lower than TC images. However, central thoracic vascular structures, cardiac chambers, and mediastinal lymph nodes were frequently rated as diagnostic (Likert ≥3) with high diagnostic agreement. In contrast, abdominal solid organs and vessels were often judged non-diagnostic, mainly due to heterogeneous enhancement and apparent contrast defects. Conclusion: The synthesis of VCE images from PCCT datasets is feasible and shows excellent quantitative similarity to TC images, with promising results for thoracic applications but limited reliability for abdominal evaluation at this stage.

Journal of Clinical Imaging ScienceVol. 16
University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Geneva College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.