An Automated Artistic Image Aesthetic Evaluation Framework via Expert Knowledge Injection into Large Vision-Language Models

Image aesthetic assessment (IAA) has progressed from handcrafted visual features to deep neural models, yet fine-art evaluation remains difficult because aesthetic judgment depends on style, historical context, and formal composition. Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) offer strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but their direct application to art critique can produce generic descriptions, unstable scores, and weakly interpretable judgments. We therefore propose the Aesthetic Expert Knowledge Injection (AEKI) framework, which translates formal art principles into structured, machine-executable instructions. AEKI operationalizes four dimensions—Contrast & Harmony, Rhythm & Flow, Symmetry & Balance, and Variety & Unity—and assigns style-dependent weights w* across 16 artistic categories. The resulting three-stage pipeline performs style anchoring, expert-weight allocation, and structured instruction compilation before LVLM inference. We evaluate the framework on a multi-category painting collection and a balanced subset annotated by human evaluators. Comparisons with zero-shot LVLM baselines show improved alignment in both numerical scoring and critique professionalism, while ablation experiments clarify the contributions of style anchoring and dynamic weighting. These results indicate that domain knowledge can be incorporated into LVLM evaluation through a transparent rule-based layer, supporting applications in digital curation, computational aesthetics, and art education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14173205
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Automated Artistic Image Aesthetic Evaluation Framework via Expert Knowledge Injection into Large Vision-Language Models

Bozhi Zhang, Tiancheng Zhang, Mingxing Shao, Shenyu Xu
Mathematics
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

An Automated Artistic Image Aesthetic Evaluation Framework via Expert Knowledge Injection into Large Vision-Language Models

Bozhi Zhang, Tiancheng Zhang, Mingxing Shao, Shenyu Xu
article en

Abstract

Image aesthetic assessment (IAA) has progressed from handcrafted visual features to deep neural models, yet fine-art evaluation remains difficult because aesthetic judgment depends on style, historical context, and formal composition. Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) offer strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but their direct application to art critique can produce generic descriptions, unstable scores, and weakly interpretable judgments. We therefore propose the Aesthetic Expert Knowledge Injection (AEKI) framework, which translates formal art principles into structured, machine-executable instructions. AEKI operationalizes four dimensions—Contrast & Harmony, Rhythm & Flow, Symmetry & Balance, and Variety & Unity—and assigns style-dependent weights w* across 16 artistic categories. The resulting three-stage pipeline performs style anchoring, expert-weight allocation, and structured instruction compilation before LVLM inference. We evaluate the framework on a multi-category painting collection and a balanced subset annotated by human evaluators. Comparisons with zero-shot LVLM baselines show improved alignment in both numerical scoring and critique professionalism, while ablation experiments clarify the contributions of style anchoring and dynamic weighting. These results indicate that domain knowledge can be incorporated into LVLM evaluation through a transparent rule-based layer, supporting applications in digital curation, computational aesthetics, and art education.

MathematicsVol. 14(17)
Northeastern University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.