Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Risk: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations

In 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) removed its prior class-wide boxed warnings for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), paving the way for increased clinical use. Menopause accelerates cardiovascular risk independently of chronological aging, manifesting as a 7.5% increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity within 1 year and a hypertension prevalence of 66.6% in women aged 55-64 years. Risk stratification for MHT hinges on the timing of initiation and the administered formulation. The 2025 Women's Health Initiative secondary analysis suggests that in symptomatic women aged 50-59 years, combination (estrogen-progestogen) MHT maintains atherosclerotic neutrality while reducing vasomotor symptoms by 59%. Conversely, atherosclerotic risk increases in women aged 70-79 years (hazard ratio 3.22 for combined therapy). Route of administration dictates the metabolic effect: oral estrogens undergo hepatic first-pass metabolism, elevating venous thromboembolism risk and increasing triglycerides by 5-15%, whereas transdermal formulations bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism, decrease triglycerides by 5-30%, and carry a neutral thromboembolic risk profile. When concurrent progestogen therapy is required, natural micronized progesterone is favored over synthetic medroxyprogesterone acetate to preserve estrogen-mediated vascular benefits. Oral or transdermal systemic MHT can be considered for vasomotor symptom management in women <60 years or within 10 years of menopause with a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk of <5% and a coronary artery calcium score of zero.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001464
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Risk: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations

Shea‐Lee Godin, Ashwin A. Pillai, Aryan Mehta, William H. Frishman et al.
Cardiology in Review
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Risk: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations

Shea‐Lee Godin, Ashwin A. Pillai, Aryan Mehta, William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow
article en

Abstract

In 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) removed its prior class-wide boxed warnings for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), paving the way for increased clinical use. Menopause accelerates cardiovascular risk independently of chronological aging, manifesting as a 7.5% increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity within 1 year and a hypertension prevalence of 66.6% in women aged 55-64 years. Risk stratification for MHT hinges on the timing of initiation and the administered formulation. The 2025 Women's Health Initiative secondary analysis suggests that in symptomatic women aged 50-59 years, combination (estrogen-progestogen) MHT maintains atherosclerotic neutrality while reducing vasomotor symptoms by 59%. Conversely, atherosclerotic risk increases in women aged 70-79 years (hazard ratio 3.22 for combined therapy). Route of administration dictates the metabolic effect: oral estrogens undergo hepatic first-pass metabolism, elevating venous thromboembolism risk and increasing triglycerides by 5-15%, whereas transdermal formulations bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism, decrease triglycerides by 5-30%, and carry a neutral thromboembolic risk profile. When concurrent progestogen therapy is required, natural micronized progesterone is favored over synthetic medroxyprogesterone acetate to preserve estrogen-mediated vascular benefits. Oral or transdermal systemic MHT can be considered for vasomotor symptom management in women <60 years or within 10 years of menopause with a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk of <5% and a coronary artery calcium score of zero.

Cardiology in Review
Westchester Medical Center (US), New York Medical College (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Brown University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.