Providing End-of-Life Care to Older Adults: A Qualitative Interpretative Meta-Synthesis of Clinicians’ Experiences

Clinicians are integral to end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making and play a critical role in shaping the experiences of older adults and their families during the final days of life. This qualitative interpretative meta-synthesis (QIMS) examined the existing published qualitative literature to synthesize the experiences and perspectives among clinicians in the provision of EOL care to older adults. The search yielded 2822 potentially relevant articles, and 137 duplicates were eliminated resulting in a final sample of six articles. Four new themes were developed: Theme 1: Ambiguity and negotiation in end-of-life communication and decision making; Theme 2: Provider Emotional and Ethical Burden; Theme 3: Tensions with age-based treatment and perceived worth; and Theme 4: Systemic Constraints and Institutional Barriers in End-of-life care. The findings highlight that to mitigate and improve the EOL care experience for older adults, it is imperative to implement system-level reforms that support proactive communication, reduce implicit age-related assumptions, and provide ethical solutions for clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261485481
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Providing End-of-Life Care to Older Adults: A Qualitative Interpretative Meta-Synthesis of Clinicians’ Experiences

Swasati Handique, Scott D. Ryan, Michael Bennett
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Providing End-of-Life Care to Older Adults: A Qualitative Interpretative Meta-Synthesis of Clinicians’ Experiences

Swasati Handique, Scott D. Ryan, Michael Bennett
article en

Abstract

Clinicians are integral to end-of-life (EOL) care decision-making and play a critical role in shaping the experiences of older adults and their families during the final days of life. This qualitative interpretative meta-synthesis (QIMS) examined the existing published qualitative literature to synthesize the experiences and perspectives among clinicians in the provision of EOL care to older adults. The search yielded 2822 potentially relevant articles, and 137 duplicates were eliminated resulting in a final sample of six articles. Four new themes were developed: Theme 1: Ambiguity and negotiation in end-of-life communication and decision making; Theme 2: Provider Emotional and Ethical Burden; Theme 3: Tensions with age-based treatment and perceived worth; and Theme 4: Systemic Constraints and Institutional Barriers in End-of-life care. The findings highlight that to mitigate and improve the EOL care experience for older adults, it is imperative to implement system-level reforms that support proactive communication, reduce implicit age-related assumptions, and provide ethical solutions for clinicians.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
The University of Texas at Arlington (US), University of Louisville Hospital (US), University of Windsor (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.