Who Can Afford to Fail? Investigating Science Students' Perceptions of Failure Through the Lens of Their Identities

ABSTRACT Scientists agree that learning to cope with failures is an important skill for science students to develop, and students who participate in science research often have positive outcomes after coping with science failures. However, the experience of failure in undergraduate science education more broadly seems to have an overall negative impact on students, particularly those who hold minoritized identities in STEM settings. Past work centering on failure has rarely directly addressed the role that students’ identities play in shaping students’ coping and outcomes of STEM failure experiences. This leaves the following question unanswered: How do students see their identities as informing their perception of failure in science settings? We asked undergraduate science students enrolled in course‐based undergraduate research experiences to reflect on the relationship between their identities and their view or experience of failure within the course. Guided by hermeneutic phenomenology principles in research design, we used intersectionality theory and phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory in concert to collect and thematically analyze student survey responses. From this, we distilled five novel themes that add to prior work. These themes share how students see their identities as vulnerabilities in encountering failure as well as strengths. Notably, students holding identities that can remain undisclosed recognize the privilege they have in navigating failure, above and beyond those who hold visible minoritized identities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70097
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Can Afford to Fail? Investigating Science Students' Perceptions of Failure Through the Lens of Their Identities

Sandhya Krishnan, Joseph A. Harsh, Manuela Mejia, Lisa A. Corwin et al.
Science Education
Career Development and Diversity
article

Who Can Afford to Fail? Investigating Science Students' Perceptions of Failure Through the Lens of Their Identities

Sandhya Krishnan, Joseph A. Harsh, Manuela Mejia, Lisa A. Corwin, Isobel D Cobb
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scientists agree that learning to cope with failures is an important skill for science students to develop, and students who participate in science research often have positive outcomes after coping with science failures. However, the experience of failure in undergraduate science education more broadly seems to have an overall negative impact on students, particularly those who hold minoritized identities in STEM settings. Past work centering on failure has rarely directly addressed the role that students’ identities play in shaping students’ coping and outcomes of STEM failure experiences. This leaves the following question unanswered: How do students see their identities as informing their perception of failure in science settings? We asked undergraduate science students enrolled in course‐based undergraduate research experiences to reflect on the relationship between their identities and their view or experience of failure within the course. Guided by hermeneutic phenomenology principles in research design, we used intersectionality theory and phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory in concert to collect and thematically analyze student survey responses. From this, we distilled five novel themes that add to prior work. These themes share how students see their identities as vulnerabilities in encountering failure as well as strengths. Notably, students holding identities that can remain undisclosed recognize the privilege they have in navigating failure, above and beyond those who hold visible minoritized identities.

Science Education
University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US), James Madison University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Colorado Boulder
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.