A physician led consensus building intervention at a multi-specialty practice results in meaningful reduction of opioid prescriptions for post-operative patients

Abstract Background Despite the known opioid crisis and momentum for opioid prescribing protocols in orthopedic surgery, there are no universal guidelines for procedure-specific opioid prescription amount, or duration of use. We report results of a single, brief quality improvement intervention to reduce opioid prescribing in a private practice setting. Methods Providers attended one two-hour Journal Club structured into three components: (1) epidemiology of opioid use; (2) literature review; and (3) sub-specialty workgroups to develop protocols for opioid naïve surgical patients (discharge prescription, refill allotment, and maximum duration). Morphine equivalents (MEQs) were calculated for all surgical patients for 10 months pre- (December 2017 – September 2018) and one year post-intervention (October 2018 – September 2019), including total MEQ prescribed, mean MEQ per prescription, mean MEQ per patient, and mean count of opioid prescriptions through 90 days post-operatively. Statistical quality control charts were used to assess impact and durability of the intervention. Results Thirty-three surgeons and mid-level providers with a DEA license participated (88% participation rate). There were 7,392 opioid prescriptions written in the pre-intervention period and 7,650 opioid prescriptions post-intervention (N=15,042), for 3,962 and 4,330 patients, respectively. A significant downward shift occurred for pre- and post-intervention prescriptions across all measures: mean monthly MEQ of 334,637 (sd = 25,517) to post- intervention mean MEQ of 233,913 (sd = 58,024, p<0.001); mean MEQs per prescription from 451 MEQs (sd =373) to 350 MEQs (sd = 301, p<0.001); mean MEQ per patient from 834 (sd =1,443) to 626 (sd = 1,158, p<0.001); and mean count of prescriptions from 1.86 (sd = 1.75) to 1.77 (sd = 1.66, p=0.0108). Conclusions A one time, physician-directed educational event, combined with consensus building and procedure-specific protocol development resulted in significant declines in opioid prescribing. At one year, the trend continued and there was not an increased patient refill demand. Level of Evidence Level V; quality improvement

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.162453
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A physician led consensus building intervention at a multi-specialty practice results in meaningful reduction of opioid prescriptions for post-operative patients

Erin C. Owen, Heather Campion, John Paul Bigouette, Jenna Godfrey et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

A physician led consensus building intervention at a multi-specialty practice results in meaningful reduction of opioid prescriptions for post-operative patients

Erin C. Owen, Heather Campion, John Paul Bigouette, Jenna Godfrey, Connor Fitzpatrick, John W. Over
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite the known opioid crisis and momentum for opioid prescribing protocols in orthopedic surgery, there are no universal guidelines for procedure-specific opioid prescription amount, or duration of use. We report results of a single, brief quality improvement intervention to reduce opioid prescribing in a private practice setting. Methods Providers attended one two-hour Journal Club structured into three components: (1) epidemiology of opioid use; (2) literature review; and (3) sub-specialty workgroups to develop protocols for opioid naïve surgical patients (discharge prescription, refill allotment, and maximum duration). Morphine equivalents (MEQs) were calculated for all surgical patients for 10 months pre- (December 2017 – September 2018) and one year post-intervention (October 2018 – September 2019), including total MEQ prescribed, mean MEQ per prescription, mean MEQ per patient, and mean count of opioid prescriptions through 90 days post-operatively. Statistical quality control charts were used to assess impact and durability of the intervention. Results Thirty-three surgeons and mid-level providers with a DEA license participated (88% participation rate). There were 7,392 opioid prescriptions written in the pre-intervention period and 7,650 opioid prescriptions post-intervention (N=15,042), for 3,962 and 4,330 patients, respectively. A significant downward shift occurred for pre- and post-intervention prescriptions across all measures: mean monthly MEQ of 334,637 (sd = 25,517) to post- intervention mean MEQ of 233,913 (sd = 58,024, p<0.001); mean MEQs per prescription from 451 MEQs (sd =373) to 350 MEQs (sd = 301, p<0.001); mean MEQ per patient from 834 (sd =1,443) to 626 (sd = 1,158, p<0.001); and mean count of prescriptions from 1.86 (sd = 1.75) to 1.77 (sd = 1.66, p=0.0108). Conclusions A one time, physician-directed educational event, combined with consensus building and procedure-specific protocol development resulted in significant declines in opioid prescribing. At one year, the trend continued and there was not an increased patient refill demand. Level of Evidence Level V; quality improvement

Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & InnovationVol. 7(2)
Slocum Research and Education Foundation (US), Slocum Center for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.