Assessing the effectiveness of supertension-relieving suture technique in minimizing scar formation following melanocytic nevi excision

To evaluate the efficacy of the supertension-relieving suture (SRS) technique in reducing scar formation following melanocytic nevi excision. A total of 120 patients with melanocytic nevi were included and categorized into the SRS group ( n = 71) and the CON group (conventional suturing, n = 49). At 12 months postoperatively, the CON group exhibited physiological changes of natural scar remodeling: PSAS, OSAS, POSAS, and VSS scores decreased from 39.41 ± 5.21, 36.51 ± 3.76, 75.92 ± 6.79, and 11.86 ± 2.06 to 8.14 ± 1.57, 5.98 ± 1.48, 14.12 ± 2.06, and 1.81 ± 0.77, respectively; scar width increased from 2.12 ± 0.62 to 2.78 ± 0.84 mm, everted wounds decreased from 8.75 ± 0.76 to 0.94 ± 0.26 mm, and 9 complications occurred. In contrast, the SRS group showed improved remodeling: PSAS, OSAS, POSAS, and VSS scores declined from 40.21 ± 4.92, 36.51 ± 4.13, 76.72 ± 6.00, and 11.43 ± 2.15 to 6.52 ± 1.28, 4.31 ± 1.21, 10.83 ± 1.83, and 1.17 ± 0.60, respectively. Meanwhile, hyperplasia was reduced, scar width only changed from 1.95 ± 0.56 to 2.36 ± 0.71 mm, everted wounds decreased from 8.92 ± 0.91 to 0.72 ± 0.16 mm, with 3 complications. Compared with the CON group, the SRS group had significantly lower PSAS, OSAS, POSAS, and VSS scores, narrower scars, less wound eversion, and fewer complications at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months. The SRS technique improves scar healing after melanocytic nevi excision, contributing to better cosmetic outcomes and fewer complications than conventional suturing methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-05027-y
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the effectiveness of supertension-relieving suture technique in minimizing scar formation following melanocytic nevi excision

Minjuan Zhao, Fan Zheng, Qianying Dou, Li Li et al.
European journal of medical research
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Assessing the effectiveness of supertension-relieving suture technique in minimizing scar formation following melanocytic nevi excision

Minjuan Zhao, Fan Zheng, Qianying Dou, Li Li, Guodong Chen
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of the supertension-relieving suture (SRS) technique in reducing scar formation following melanocytic nevi excision. A total of 120 patients with melanocytic nevi were included and categorized into the SRS group ( n = 71) and the CON group (conventional suturing, n = 49). At 12 months postoperatively, the CON group exhibited physiological changes of natural scar remodeling: PSAS, OSAS, POSAS, and VSS scores decreased from 39.41 ± 5.21, 36.51 ± 3.76, 75.92 ± 6.79, and 11.86 ± 2.06 to 8.14 ± 1.57, 5.98 ± 1.48, 14.12 ± 2.06, and 1.81 ± 0.77, respectively; scar width increased from 2.12 ± 0.62 to 2.78 ± 0.84 mm, everted wounds decreased from 8.75 ± 0.76 to 0.94 ± 0.26 mm, and 9 complications occurred. In contrast, the SRS group showed improved remodeling: PSAS, OSAS, POSAS, and VSS scores declined from 40.21 ± 4.92, 36.51 ± 4.13, 76.72 ± 6.00, and 11.43 ± 2.15 to 6.52 ± 1.28, 4.31 ± 1.21, 10.83 ± 1.83, and 1.17 ± 0.60, respectively. Meanwhile, hyperplasia was reduced, scar width only changed from 1.95 ± 0.56 to 2.36 ± 0.71 mm, everted wounds decreased from 8.92 ± 0.91 to 0.72 ± 0.16 mm, with 3 complications. Compared with the CON group, the SRS group had significantly lower PSAS, OSAS, POSAS, and VSS scores, narrower scars, less wound eversion, and fewer complications at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months. The SRS technique improves scar healing after melanocytic nevi excision, contributing to better cosmetic outcomes and fewer complications than conventional suturing methods.

European journal of medical research
Shangqiu First People's Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.