Computed tomography portal venous reconstruction assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided selective inflow vessel devascularization for the treatment of type 1 gastroesophageal varices

EUS-guided combination therapy (coil and hemostatic glue) for bleeding and non-bleeding gastric varices has recently attracted considerable attention after promising results were published in multiple small studies. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided combination therapy in the treatment of GVs. Publications investigating the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided combination therapy in patients with gastric varices were searched in Medline, Ovid Journals, Medline non-indexed citations and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Pooling was conducted by both fixed and random effects model. In pooled analysis of 10 studies ( N = 323), the technical success of EUS-guided combination therapy was 98.66% (95% CI 97.14–99.62). The pooled variceal obliteration rate after first session of treatment was 78.31% (95% CI 73.05–83.14). In patients requiring single or multiple treatment sessions, the overall variceal obliteration rate was 96.79% (95% CI 94.28–98.60). The pooled rate of hemorrhage from treated gastric varices was 4.92% (95% CI 2.85–7.52). After EUS-guided combination therapy, the pooled percentage of patients developing abdominal pain was 9.79% (95% CI 6.82–13.24), pulmonary embolism was 2.20% (95% CI 0.89–4.06), febrile episodes was 1.17% (95% CI 0.30–2.61), and procedure-related bleeding was noted in 2.62% (95% CI 1.18–4.63) of the patients. Subgroup analysis of studies using coil embolization and cyanoacrylate injection showed pooled variceal obliteration rate of 77.92% (95% CI 72.35–83.01) after first session of treatment. In patients requiring single or multiple treatment sessions, the overall variceal obliteration rate was 96.76% (95% CI 94.11–98.65). The pooled rate of re-bleeding from treated gastric varices was 5.09% (95% CI 2.90–7.83). This meta-analysis suggests that EUS-guided combination therapy is safe and effective for patients with gastric varices and should be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Endoscopy
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.451
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Computed tomography portal venous reconstruction assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided selective inflow vessel devascularization for the treatment of type 1 gastroesophageal varices

Qingyan Fu, Haiping Peng, Xiang Ding
Clinical Endoscopy
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Computed tomography portal venous reconstruction assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided selective inflow vessel devascularization for the treatment of type 1 gastroesophageal varices

Qingyan Fu, Haiping Peng, Xiang Ding
article en

Abstract

EUS-guided combination therapy (coil and hemostatic glue) for bleeding and non-bleeding gastric varices has recently attracted considerable attention after promising results were published in multiple small studies. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided combination therapy in the treatment of GVs. Publications investigating the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided combination therapy in patients with gastric varices were searched in Medline, Ovid Journals, Medline non-indexed citations and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Pooling was conducted by both fixed and random effects model. In pooled analysis of 10 studies ( N = 323), the technical success of EUS-guided combination therapy was 98.66% (95% CI 97.14–99.62). The pooled variceal obliteration rate after first session of treatment was 78.31% (95% CI 73.05–83.14). In patients requiring single or multiple treatment sessions, the overall variceal obliteration rate was 96.79% (95% CI 94.28–98.60). The pooled rate of hemorrhage from treated gastric varices was 4.92% (95% CI 2.85–7.52). After EUS-guided combination therapy, the pooled percentage of patients developing abdominal pain was 9.79% (95% CI 6.82–13.24), pulmonary embolism was 2.20% (95% CI 0.89–4.06), febrile episodes was 1.17% (95% CI 0.30–2.61), and procedure-related bleeding was noted in 2.62% (95% CI 1.18–4.63) of the patients. Subgroup analysis of studies using coil embolization and cyanoacrylate injection showed pooled variceal obliteration rate of 77.92% (95% CI 72.35–83.01) after first session of treatment. In patients requiring single or multiple treatment sessions, the overall variceal obliteration rate was 96.76% (95% CI 94.11–98.65). The pooled rate of re-bleeding from treated gastric varices was 5.09% (95% CI 2.90–7.83). This meta-analysis suggests that EUS-guided combination therapy is safe and effective for patients with gastric varices and should be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

Clinical Endoscopy
Jishou University (CN), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Yueyang Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.