Artificial intelligence–driven decision-making after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is increasingly managed by endoscopic resection (ER); however, lymph node metastasis (LNM), which occurs in approximately 5%-10% of cases, remains the key determinant for recommending additional gastrectomy. Current guideline-based strategies, including the eCura system, provide structured risk stratification but rely on categorical decision-making and may lead to overtreatment, as nearly 90% of patients undergoing additional surgery do not have LNM. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for improving LNM predictions. Machine learning models using clinicopathological variables have demonstrated promising discriminatory performance (area under the curve, 0.69-0.94), often outperforming conventional scoring systems such as eCura. However, these approaches rely on predefined variables and are susceptible to interobserver variability in pathological assessments. Whole-slide image-based AI directly analyzes histopathological images, offering an objective and reproducible approach. Although evidence for EGC is limited, recent multicenter data have demonstrated promising results using routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. Beyond the LNM risk, treatment decisions should also consider patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and competing mortality risks. AI is expected to support treatment decision-making by integrating these multidimensional factors, enabling more personalized and risk-adapted management after ER.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Endoscopy
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2026.176
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence–driven decision-making after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

Taishi Okumura, Masashi Misawa, Katsuro Ichimasa, Kazuo Ohtsuka et al.
Clinical Endoscopy
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Artificial intelligence–driven decision-making after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

Taishi Okumura, Masashi Misawa, Katsuro Ichimasa, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Khay Guan Yeoh, Yasuharu Maeda, Tetsuo Nemoto, Sho Suzuki
article en

Abstract

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is increasingly managed by endoscopic resection (ER); however, lymph node metastasis (LNM), which occurs in approximately 5%-10% of cases, remains the key determinant for recommending additional gastrectomy. Current guideline-based strategies, including the eCura system, provide structured risk stratification but rely on categorical decision-making and may lead to overtreatment, as nearly 90% of patients undergoing additional surgery do not have LNM. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for improving LNM predictions. Machine learning models using clinicopathological variables have demonstrated promising discriminatory performance (area under the curve, 0.69-0.94), often outperforming conventional scoring systems such as eCura. However, these approaches rely on predefined variables and are susceptible to interobserver variability in pathological assessments. Whole-slide image-based AI directly analyzes histopathological images, offering an objective and reproducible approach. Although evidence for EGC is limited, recent multicenter data have demonstrated promising results using routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. Beyond the LNM risk, treatment decisions should also consider patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and competing mortality risks. AI is expected to support treatment decision-making by integrating these multidimensional factors, enabling more personalized and risk-adapted management after ER.

Clinical Endoscopy
National University of Singapore (SG), SHOWA Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital (JP), National University Hospital (SG), International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.