Assessment of medical students’ perceptions of a mixed reality-based head-mounted display for neuroanatomy education

Abstract Background Many medical students develop an aversion to neurology because of insufficient understanding of neuroanatomical structures and limited educational opportunities. Extended reality (XR), an umbrella term encompassing virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), has attracted considerable attention as a novel educational tool for addressing challenges in neuroanatomy education. In this study, questionnaire-based evaluations were subsequently conducted to investigate the potential usefulness of MR-based head-mounted display (HMD) for future neuroanatomy education. Methods Three-dimensional images derived from neurosurgical cases were created and displayed using an MR-based HMD. Thirty-one medical students experienced the educational program and subsequently completed a questionnaire. Each of the 10 questionnaire items (Q1-Q10) was quantitatively evaluated using a 10-point Likert scale. To quantify learners’ psychological constructs, seven questionnaire items (Q1-Q7) were aggregated into two Likert scales: the “Usefulness” scale (Q1- Q4) and the “Interest and Motivation for Learning” scale (Q5-Q7). Results The mean scores for the “Usefulness” scale and the “Interest and Motivation for Learning” scale were 9.27 ± 1.21 and 8.85 ± 1.44 (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. In contrast, the mean score for “User Satisfaction with Operability” (Q8) was 7.42 ± 1.84. Additionally, the score for “Physical Strain” (Q10) was low (1.68 ± 1.01). Conclusions Both the “Usefulness” and the “Interest and Motivation for Learning” scale demonstrated high scores. In contrast, “User Satisfaction with Operability” was relatively lower, although “Physical Strain” remained minimal. These findings suggest that MR-based HMDs are promising educational tools for neuroanatomy education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10795-6
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Assessment of medical students’ perceptions of a mixed reality-based head-mounted display for neuroanatomy education

Shinji Kawabata, Masahiro Kameda, Rina Kazuki, Ryo Hiramatsu et al.
4 links
BMC Medical Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Assessment of medical students’ perceptions of a mixed reality-based head-mounted display for neuroanatomy education

Shinji Kawabata, Masahiro Kameda, Rina Kazuki, Ryo Hiramatsu, Masahiko Wanibuchi, Naosuke Nonoguchi, Toshihiro Takami, Motomasa Furuse, Kenichiro Eza, Syougo Tanabe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Many medical students develop an aversion to neurology because of insufficient understanding of neuroanatomical structures and limited educational opportunities. Extended reality (XR), an umbrella term encompassing virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), has attracted considerable attention as a novel educational tool for addressing challenges in neuroanatomy education. In this study, questionnaire-based evaluations were subsequently conducted to investigate the potential usefulness of MR-based head-mounted display (HMD) for future neuroanatomy education. Methods Three-dimensional images derived from neurosurgical cases were created and displayed using an MR-based HMD. Thirty-one medical students experienced the educational program and subsequently completed a questionnaire. Each of the 10 questionnaire items (Q1-Q10) was quantitatively evaluated using a 10-point Likert scale. To quantify learners’ psychological constructs, seven questionnaire items (Q1-Q7) were aggregated into two Likert scales: the “Usefulness” scale (Q1- Q4) and the “Interest and Motivation for Learning” scale (Q5-Q7). Results The mean scores for the “Usefulness” scale and the “Interest and Motivation for Learning” scale were 9.27 ± 1.21 and 8.85 ± 1.44 (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. In contrast, the mean score for “User Satisfaction with Operability” (Q8) was 7.42 ± 1.84. Additionally, the score for “Physical Strain” (Q10) was low (1.68 ± 1.01). Conclusions Both the “Usefulness” and the “Interest and Motivation for Learning” scale demonstrated high scores. In contrast, “User Satisfaction with Operability” was relatively lower, although “Physical Strain” remained minimal. These findings suggest that MR-based HMDs are promising educational tools for neuroanatomy education.

BMC Medical Education
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (JP)
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon