The effects of subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction on upper extremity functionality, range of motion, and proprioception in patients with breast cancer

Shoulder pain and decreased glenohumeral joint movement are commonly observed after surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper extremity functionality, shoulder joint range of motion, and shoulder proprioception in patients who underwent subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction. This study was designed as a cross-sectional study. A total of 80 female patients were included in the study (subpectoral implant surgery, n = 28; prepectoral implant surgery, n = 28; control group, n = 24). Patients who had undergone subpectoral or prepectoral implant reconstruction surgery at least 3 months prior were included in the evaluation. Participants’ upper extremity functional levels were assessed using the DASH; the active normal range of motion of the shoulder joint was measured with a universal goniometer; and shoulder joint proprioception was evaluated with a “Clinometer.” No significant differences were found between subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction regarding DASH, ROM, and 45°-75° ER proprioception ( p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between healthy and surgically treated female participants ( p < 0.05). Proprioception values for the 45° IR angle were significantly different between surgery groups and healthy female groups ( p < 0.05). Breast reconstruction surgery had negative effects on upper extremity functionality and normal joint range of motion, which persisted three months post-surgery. However, no significant difference was found between the commonly used SIS and PIS methods. While shoulder joint proprioception was not negatively affected in women who underwent PIS, women who underwent SIS experienced impaired proprioception at the 45° IR angle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04851-y
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction on upper extremity functionality, range of motion, and proprioception in patients with breast cancer

Mahmut Çalık, Çetin Sayaca, Mine Simsek, Burcu Celet Ozden
BMC Women s Health
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

The effects of subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction on upper extremity functionality, range of motion, and proprioception in patients with breast cancer

Mahmut Çalık, Çetin Sayaca, Mine Simsek, Burcu Celet Ozden
article en

Abstract

Shoulder pain and decreased glenohumeral joint movement are commonly observed after surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper extremity functionality, shoulder joint range of motion, and shoulder proprioception in patients who underwent subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction. This study was designed as a cross-sectional study. A total of 80 female patients were included in the study (subpectoral implant surgery, n = 28; prepectoral implant surgery, n = 28; control group, n = 24). Patients who had undergone subpectoral or prepectoral implant reconstruction surgery at least 3 months prior were included in the evaluation. Participants’ upper extremity functional levels were assessed using the DASH; the active normal range of motion of the shoulder joint was measured with a universal goniometer; and shoulder joint proprioception was evaluated with a “Clinometer.” No significant differences were found between subpectoral and prepectoral implant reconstruction regarding DASH, ROM, and 45°-75° ER proprioception ( p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between healthy and surgically treated female participants ( p < 0.05). Proprioception values for the 45° IR angle were significantly different between surgery groups and healthy female groups ( p < 0.05). Breast reconstruction surgery had negative effects on upper extremity functionality and normal joint range of motion, which persisted three months post-surgery. However, no significant difference was found between the commonly used SIS and PIS methods. While shoulder joint proprioception was not negatively affected in women who underwent PIS, women who underwent SIS experienced impaired proprioception at the 45° IR angle.

BMC Women s Health
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Turkish Society of Cardiology (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.