Biome classification across global vegetation models reveals consistent biome shifts under future climate change

Climate change is altering ecosystems and will reshape the global distribution of biomes. These shifts can significantly influence biodiversity, ecosystem functions and services that are essential for human livelihoods. Robust assessments of future biome dynamics are therefore urgently needed. Here, we aimed to robustly quantify and map future biome shifts under climate change using a reproducible, multi-model ensemble approach. We employed random forest models to classify outputs from five global vegetation models (GVMs) into 31 observation-based biome maps representing land cover under current climate conditions. Model-derived biome maps showed strong agreement with observation-based maps (average κ =0.77 for 31 maps), with higher agreement for biomes with well-known temperature constraints. Then we used the random forest models and GVM simulations for future climate conditions to infer future biome distributions, and we evaluated potential biome shifts for each GVM-biome map combination under three climate change scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP6.0, RCP8.5, 403 maps in total). Across all scenarios, GVMs projected biome shifts until the end of the century, where the likelihood of change increased with the level of climate change in RCP scenarios. Between 4 % and 56 % of the land surface were projected to undergo biome transitions in the full model ensemble of 403 different combinations of GVMs, RCPs and observation-based biome maps used to create biome maps. Broad spatial patterns of biome change were consistent across models. Biomes in cold regions were most susceptible to biome shifts, as boreal and temperate biomes shifted poleward, following temperature change. Equatorial rainforests remained largely stable, while other studies found forest dieback. These findings highlight regions and biomes most susceptible to future climate change, even under the low-emission scenario RCP2.6. Overall, we developed a multi-model GVM ensemble of future biome projections, based on a unified and reproducible biome classification approach. This approach allows quantification of uncertainties related to biome classification schemes across multiple GVMs and RCP scenarios, and it can be applied to any vegetation model. We provide critical insights for targeted climate mitigation and adaptation strategies and conservation of the remaining natural vegetation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biogeosciences
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-6409-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Biome classification across global vegetation models reveals consistent biome shifts under future climate change

Simon Scheiter, Marie Dury, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Wenfang Xu et al.
1 citations
Biogeosciences
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
4.21
article

Biome classification across global vegetation models reveals consistent biome shifts under future climate change

Simon Scheiter, Marie Dury, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Wenfang Xu, Jinfeng Chang, Matthew Forrest, Wim Thiery, Christopher Reyer, Jörg Steinkamp, Philippe Ciais, Alexandra Henrot, Thomas Hickler, Louis Francois
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate change is altering ecosystems and will reshape the global distribution of biomes. These shifts can significantly influence biodiversity, ecosystem functions and services that are essential for human livelihoods. Robust assessments of future biome dynamics are therefore urgently needed. Here, we aimed to robustly quantify and map future biome shifts under climate change using a reproducible, multi-model ensemble approach. We employed random forest models to classify outputs from five global vegetation models (GVMs) into 31 observation-based biome maps representing land cover under current climate conditions. Model-derived biome maps showed strong agreement with observation-based maps (average κ =0.77 for 31 maps), with higher agreement for biomes with well-known temperature constraints. Then we used the random forest models and GVM simulations for future climate conditions to infer future biome distributions, and we evaluated potential biome shifts for each GVM-biome map combination under three climate change scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP6.0, RCP8.5, 403 maps in total). Across all scenarios, GVMs projected biome shifts until the end of the century, where the likelihood of change increased with the level of climate change in RCP scenarios. Between 4 % and 56 % of the land surface were projected to undergo biome transitions in the full model ensemble of 403 different combinations of GVMs, RCPs and observation-based biome maps used to create biome maps. Broad spatial patterns of biome change were consistent across models. Biomes in cold regions were most susceptible to biome shifts, as boreal and temperate biomes shifted poleward, following temperature change. Equatorial rainforests remained largely stable, while other studies found forest dieback. These findings highlight regions and biomes most susceptible to future climate change, even under the low-emission scenario RCP2.6. Overall, we developed a multi-model GVM ensemble of future biome projections, based on a unified and reproducible biome classification approach. This approach allows quantification of uncertainties related to biome classification schemes across multiple GVMs and RCP scenarios, and it can be applied to any vegetation model. We provide critical insights for targeted climate mitigation and adaptation strategies and conservation of the remaining natural vegetation.

BiogeosciencesVol. 23(18)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Liège (BE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), ETH Zurich (CH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE), Institut Scientifique de Service Public (BE), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), South China Botanical Garden (CN), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Zhejiang University (CN)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.