First-principles optical response of shock-compressed lithium fluoride: Quasiparticle, excitonic, and ionic-temperature effects

We investigate the refractive index n of lithium fluoride (LiF) using density-functional theory + G0W0 (a symbolic notation combining Green’s function G and the screened Coulomb interaction W) + Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE), with ionic-temperature effects included through quantum molecular dynamics (QMD). We calculate photon-energy dispersions n(ω) and k(ω) at ambient pressure and n(ρ, T) at 532 and 1550 nm under shock compression, where ρ and T vary together. Quasiparticle band structures at ambient and compressed conditions and the ambient-pressure orbital-projected density of states connect the optical response to the electronic structure. At ambient pressure, G0W0 yields a quasiparticle gap of 14.25 eV, close to the experimental 14.2 eV, while BSE reproduces the main excitonic feature at 12.5 eV, close to the observed 12.6 eV. Quasiparticle and excitonic effects are thus essential for accurate optical dispersion; the hybrid Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof functional does not reproduce the optical spectra. Along the principal Hugoniot up to 140 GPa, n(ρ) agrees closely with shock data at 1550 nm and acceptably at 532 nm and agrees better overall than earlier first-principles calculations. Above approximately 110–120 GPa, QMD produces a downturn relative to cold n(ρ) curves, suggesting that ionic dynamics may contribute to nonlinearity in the n–ρ relation. QMD-sampling and finite-k-grid uncertainties are estimated, and transition-peak broadening is assessed. The gap increases under pressure, with a transition to a Γ → L indirect gap near 50 GPa. An exploratory calculation at approximately 1400 GPa finds a gap of about 24 eV, disfavoring gap-closure metallization. Structural and elastic benchmarks are also provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0358988
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

First-principles optical response of shock-compressed lithium fluoride: Quasiparticle, excitonic, and ionic-temperature effects

М. С. Фадеев
1 links
Journal of Applied Physics
High-pressure geophysics and materials
article

First-principles optical response of shock-compressed lithium fluoride: Quasiparticle, excitonic, and ionic-temperature effects

М. С. Фадеев
article en

Abstract

We investigate the refractive index n of lithium fluoride (LiF) using density-functional theory + G0W0 (a symbolic notation combining Green’s function G and the screened Coulomb interaction W) + Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE), with ionic-temperature effects included through quantum molecular dynamics (QMD). We calculate photon-energy dispersions n(ω) and k(ω) at ambient pressure and n(ρ, T) at 532 and 1550 nm under shock compression, where ρ and T vary together. Quasiparticle band structures at ambient and compressed conditions and the ambient-pressure orbital-projected density of states connect the optical response to the electronic structure. At ambient pressure, G0W0 yields a quasiparticle gap of 14.25 eV, close to the experimental 14.2 eV, while BSE reproduces the main excitonic feature at 12.5 eV, close to the observed 12.6 eV. Quasiparticle and excitonic effects are thus essential for accurate optical dispersion; the hybrid Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof functional does not reproduce the optical spectra. Along the principal Hugoniot up to 140 GPa, n(ρ) agrees closely with shock data at 1550 nm and acceptably at 532 nm and agrees better overall than earlier first-principles calculations. Above approximately 110–120 GPa, QMD produces a downturn relative to cold n(ρ) curves, suggesting that ionic dynamics may contribute to nonlinearity in the n–ρ relation. QMD-sampling and finite-k-grid uncertainties are estimated, and transition-peak broadening is assessed. The gap increases under pressure, with a transition to a Γ → L indirect gap near 50 GPa. An exploratory calculation at approximately 1400 GPa finds a gap of about 24 eV, disfavoring gap-closure metallization. Structural and elastic benchmarks are also provided.

Journal of Applied PhysicsVol. 140(18)
Joint Institute for High Temperatures (RU)
High-pressure geophysics and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon