Role of a Novel, Fresh-Frozen Cellular Bone Allograft in Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion

Study Design: Retrospective matched-cohort study. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and economic impact of a novel cellular bone allograft (PrimaGen Advanced Allograft; CBA-P) used in combination with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) for short-segment lumbar interbody fusion. Summary of Background Data: Osteobiologic grafts are increasingly used to optimize lumbar interbody fusion outcomes. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) improves fusion rates but is costly and associated with complications. Cellular bone allografts (CBAs) aim to enhance fusion by providing a bony scaffold, growth factors, and viable cells, but their clinical and economic benefit remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 100 adults who underwent 1- or 2-level posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2017 and 2023. Fifty patients received CBA-P with rhBMP-2 (experimental cohort), and 50 matched controls received rhBMP-2 with standard-of-care demineralized bone matrix and/or allograft bone powder. Matching was based on age decade, sex, and fusion level. The primary outcome was interbody fusion at 12 and 24 months, assessed using a validated radiograph measurement platform. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, complications, pain scores, and per-case osteobiologic cost. Results: Fusion rates were similar between cohorts at 12 months (95.7% vs. 89.1%, P =0.27) and 24 months (100% vs. 89.5%, P =0.49), with comparable revision and complication rates. Estimated blood loss (364.4 vs. 232.9 mL, P <0.001) and 6-month pain scores ( P =0.03) were higher in the experimental cohort. CBA-P use significantly increased per-case osteobiologic cost ($9478 vs. $5252, P <0.0001). Conclusions: Use of CBA-P with rhBMP-2 did not improve fusion rates, reduce complications, or enhance pain outcomes, yet markedly increased surgical cost. These findings do not clearly support the routine use of CBA-P alongside rhBMP-2 in short-segment lumbar interbody fusion and highlight the need for well-designed prospective studies to define its standalone clinical value. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Published
2026-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000002154
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Role of a Novel, Fresh-Frozen Cellular Bone Allograft in Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion

Andriy Noshchenko, Jingdian Huang, Charles P. Nolte, Vikas Patel et al.
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Role of a Novel, Fresh-Frozen Cellular Bone Allograft in Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion

Andriy Noshchenko, Jingdian Huang, Charles P. Nolte, Vikas Patel, Caleb Wipf, Arjun Singh, Aaron Ishmael
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective matched-cohort study. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and economic impact of a novel cellular bone allograft (PrimaGen Advanced Allograft; CBA-P) used in combination with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) for short-segment lumbar interbody fusion. Summary of Background Data: Osteobiologic grafts are increasingly used to optimize lumbar interbody fusion outcomes. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) improves fusion rates but is costly and associated with complications. Cellular bone allografts (CBAs) aim to enhance fusion by providing a bony scaffold, growth factors, and viable cells, but their clinical and economic benefit remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 100 adults who underwent 1- or 2-level posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2017 and 2023. Fifty patients received CBA-P with rhBMP-2 (experimental cohort), and 50 matched controls received rhBMP-2 with standard-of-care demineralized bone matrix and/or allograft bone powder. Matching was based on age decade, sex, and fusion level. The primary outcome was interbody fusion at 12 and 24 months, assessed using a validated radiograph measurement platform. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, complications, pain scores, and per-case osteobiologic cost. Results: Fusion rates were similar between cohorts at 12 months (95.7% vs. 89.1%, P =0.27) and 24 months (100% vs. 89.5%, P =0.49), with comparable revision and complication rates. Estimated blood loss (364.4 vs. 232.9 mL, P <0.001) and 6-month pain scores ( P =0.03) were higher in the experimental cohort. CBA-P use significantly increased per-case osteobiologic cost ($9478 vs. $5252, P <0.0001). Conclusions: Use of CBA-P with rhBMP-2 did not improve fusion rates, reduce complications, or enhance pain outcomes, yet markedly increased surgical cost. These findings do not clearly support the routine use of CBA-P alongside rhBMP-2 in short-segment lumbar interbody fusion and highlight the need for well-designed prospective studies to define its standalone clinical value. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.