Redefining Fatty Liver Disease: How Updated Nomenclature Reshapes Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

ABSTRACT The nomenclature of fatty liver disease has undergone substantial evolution, transitioning from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease, and more recently to metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease. This updated nomenclature has driven a fundamental transformation in laboratory diagnostic strategies. The diagnostic framework has progressively shifted from reliance on exclusionary criteria to a multidimensional, integrated approach centered on metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers. This review aims to elucidate similarities and differences among nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease, and metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease with respect to diagnostic criteria, epidemiological profiles, underlying pathogenic mechanisms related to insulin resistance, noninvasive imaging assessment, and key laboratory indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iLABMED
Published
2026-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ila2.70070
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Redefining Fatty Liver Disease: How Updated Nomenclature Reshapes Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

Ran Wei, Yuanyue Guan, Manman Zhai, Xiuying Zhao
iLABMED
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Redefining Fatty Liver Disease: How Updated Nomenclature Reshapes Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

Ran Wei, Yuanyue Guan, Manman Zhai, Xiuying Zhao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The nomenclature of fatty liver disease has undergone substantial evolution, transitioning from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease, and more recently to metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease. This updated nomenclature has driven a fundamental transformation in laboratory diagnostic strategies. The diagnostic framework has progressively shifted from reliance on exclusionary criteria to a multidimensional, integrated approach centered on metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers. This review aims to elucidate similarities and differences among nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease, and metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease with respect to diagnostic criteria, epidemiological profiles, underlying pathogenic mechanisms related to insulin resistance, noninvasive imaging assessment, and key laboratory indicators.

iLABMED
Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN), Beijing Fengtai Hospital (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining Fatty Liver Disease: How Updated Nomenclature Reshapes Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics — Ran Wei, Yuanyue Guan, et al. · iLABMED (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS