A perspective on the revised American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ guidance for transvaginal ultrasound in the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently revised its guidance regarding the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), recommending combined transvaginal ultrasonography (TV U/S) and endometrial (EM) sampling for most patients undergoing initial assessment. This perspective examines the evidence underlying these recommendations and considers their potential implications for clinical practice. Prior ACOG guidance recognized that, when the endometrium is fully visualized and measures ≤4 mm, TV U/S provides a highly effective means of excluding endometrial cancer (EC) in most women with PMB if the TV U/S is adequate and there is no persistent bleeding. Their revised recommendations place greater emphasis on EM sampling, including in several patient populations previously considered appropriate candidates for ultrasound-based evaluation. This perspective reviews the evidence this new guidance relied upon, as well as limitations of blind EM sampling, including published false-negative rates even in cases of known carcinoma, technical challenges associated with tissue acquisition, and potential procedural complications. Particular attention is given to women receiving menopausal hormone therapy, as well as nulliparous women in whom EM sampling may be technically difficult. My perspective is that former guideline-based approaches remain generally appropriate. The concern about the increasing mortality of EC in the United States is appropriate, as is the concern about racial disparities in the incidence and mortality of EC. However, the new ACOG revision will result in inappropriate, invasive EM sampling in a large number of women. The potential harms, as well as difficulties in obtaining tissue, will be substantial. Any real attempt to reduce the mortality of EC will require a better understanding of patient-specific risk factors, as well as information about less common non-EM type II cancers, especially in Black women, and better patient and practitioner education relative to PMB.