Effect of Anesthesia Type on Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Transperineal MRI-Targeted Biopsy

Background/Objectives: The transperineal approach is the recommended standard for prostate biopsy. We aimed to determine whether anesthesia type—local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA)—independently influences clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy and to evaluate its impact on biopsy–prostatectomy pathological concordance. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-naive men undergoing cognitive-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy under LA or GA. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed on age, prostate-specific antigen, PI-RADS score, and prostate volume. The primary outcome was csPCa detection (ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2) on combined systematic and targeted biopsy. Secondary outcomes included overall and high-grade cancer detection and biopsy–prostatectomy pathological concordance. Results: After matching, 220 pairs (440 patients) were analyzed. csPCa detection on combined biopsy did not differ between LA and GA (40.5% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.625; absolute risk difference −2.7 percentage points, 95% CI −11.8 to 6.4; relative risk 0.93, 95% CI 0.74–1.18), nor did overall (54.5% vs. 55.0%, p = 1.000) or high-grade cancer detection (21.4% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.569). Similarly, no significant differences were observed for systematic biopsy alone (csPCa: 36.4% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.765) or targeted biopsy alone (csPCa: 35.9% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.921). Subgroup and multivariable analyses showed that anesthesia type was not an independent predictor of csPCa (adjusted odds ratio 0.887, 95% CI 0.553–1.423, p = 0.620). Biopsy–prostatectomy pathological concordance did not differ significantly between groups in the 121 prostatectomy patients. Conclusions: Anesthesia type was not significantly associated with csPCa detection in transperineal cognitive-fusion biopsy, and pathological concordance was similar between LA and GA. These findings support the feasibility of LA transperineal biopsy, although the confidence intervals do not establish formal equivalence between the two approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172820
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Anesthesia Type on Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Transperineal MRI-Targeted Biopsy

Yuzhi Zuo, Yi Zhou, Dake Pan, Shijie Jin et al.
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Effect of Anesthesia Type on Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Transperineal MRI-Targeted Biopsy

Yuzhi Zuo, Yi Zhou, Dake Pan, Shijie Jin, Weigang Yan, Zhien Zhou
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The transperineal approach is the recommended standard for prostate biopsy. We aimed to determine whether anesthesia type—local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA)—independently influences clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy and to evaluate its impact on biopsy–prostatectomy pathological concordance. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-naive men undergoing cognitive-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy under LA or GA. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed on age, prostate-specific antigen, PI-RADS score, and prostate volume. The primary outcome was csPCa detection (ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2) on combined systematic and targeted biopsy. Secondary outcomes included overall and high-grade cancer detection and biopsy–prostatectomy pathological concordance. Results: After matching, 220 pairs (440 patients) were analyzed. csPCa detection on combined biopsy did not differ between LA and GA (40.5% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.625; absolute risk difference −2.7 percentage points, 95% CI −11.8 to 6.4; relative risk 0.93, 95% CI 0.74–1.18), nor did overall (54.5% vs. 55.0%, p = 1.000) or high-grade cancer detection (21.4% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.569). Similarly, no significant differences were observed for systematic biopsy alone (csPCa: 36.4% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.765) or targeted biopsy alone (csPCa: 35.9% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.921). Subgroup and multivariable analyses showed that anesthesia type was not an independent predictor of csPCa (adjusted odds ratio 0.887, 95% CI 0.553–1.423, p = 0.620). Biopsy–prostatectomy pathological concordance did not differ significantly between groups in the 121 prostatectomy patients. Conclusions: Anesthesia type was not significantly associated with csPCa detection in transperineal cognitive-fusion biopsy, and pathological concordance was similar between LA and GA. These findings support the feasibility of LA transperineal biopsy, although the confidence intervals do not establish formal equivalence between the two approaches.

CancersVol. 18(17)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.