Measuring Partisanship and Representation in Online Congressional Communications

Social media and the internet have created new ways for representatives to communicate. How have members of Congress responded to these opportunities? We introduce a multi-platform dataset of congressional communications extending back to the onset of the social media era. Using computational language processing, we classify approximately 4.7 million tweets, 2.4 million Facebook posts, and 184,000 email newsletters authored by members of Congress between 2009 and 2022 based on intended purpose, and scale the partisanship of each message along a continuous left–right dimension. After validation, we demonstrate how our data can be used to study partisanship and representation in the contemporary Congress. Importantly, our data show congressional rhetoric has become more partisan and negative as social media usage has increased. We identify one potential mechanism contributing to this trend: partisanship and negativity receive inflated levels of positive engagement on social media relative to other forms of messaging like credit claiming or constituency service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055426101841
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Measuring Partisanship and Representation in Online Congressional Communications

Michael R. Kistner, Elizabeth Simas, Lucas J. Lothamer, Michael Heseltine et al.
American Political Science Review
Social Media and Politics
article

Measuring Partisanship and Representation in Online Congressional Communications

Michael R. Kistner, Elizabeth Simas, Lucas J. Lothamer, Michael Heseltine, Maya Fitch, ROBERT ALVAREZ
article en

Abstract

Social media and the internet have created new ways for representatives to communicate. How have members of Congress responded to these opportunities? We introduce a multi-platform dataset of congressional communications extending back to the onset of the social media era. Using computational language processing, we classify approximately 4.7 million tweets, 2.4 million Facebook posts, and 184,000 email newsletters authored by members of Congress between 2009 and 2022 based on intended purpose, and scale the partisanship of each message along a continuous left–right dimension. After validation, we demonstrate how our data can be used to study partisanship and representation in the contemporary Congress. Importantly, our data show congressional rhetoric has become more partisan and negative as social media usage has increased. We identify one potential mechanism contributing to this trend: partisanship and negativity receive inflated levels of positive engagement on social media relative to other forms of messaging like credit claiming or constituency service.

American Political Science Review
Sam Houston State University (US), The University of Texas at Tyler (US), Mitchell Institute (US), University of Oxford (GB), University of Houston (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring Partisanship and Representation in Online Congressional Communications — Michael R. Kistner, Elizabeth Simas, et al. · American Political Science Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS