Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the howRwe questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background The howRwe questionnaire is a brief measure of patient experience that has not been adapted for Persian-speaking populations. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the Persian version of the howRwe questionnaire (P-howRwe). Methodology This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases: translation/cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. Following forward and backward translation, an expert committee reviewed the translated version and produced a pre-final Persian version, which was refined through pilot testing. Psychometric properties were evaluated in 200 inpatients in Tehran, Iran. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 50 patients over a 5- to 7-day interval. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, content validity using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI), and concurrent validity using the Persian SERVQUAL questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis and mirror exploratory factor analysis in two random subsamples. Results The Persian version showed good acceptability, with no reported comprehension difficulties during pre-final testing. The mean total P-howRwe score was 10.62 ± 1.32 (range 1–12). It demonstrated satisfactory reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.84; McDonald’s ω = 0.86; ICC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76–0.85) and strong content validity, as assessed by a panel of 10 experts (CVR = 0.93–1.00; S-CVI/Ave = 0.95). Concurrent validity was supported by a significant positive correlation with Persian SERVQUAL scores ( r = 0.75, p < 0.01). Exploratory factor analysis identified a single factor explaining 69.28% of the total variance, with CR = 0.86 and AVE = 0.63. Mirror exploratory factor analysis in two random subsamples yielded comparable one-factor solutions, supporting structural stability. Conclusions The P-howRwe is a brief, culturally appropriate, and psychometrically sound instrument for assessing patient experience in similar Persian-speaking tertiary inpatient settings. Further validation in other healthcare contexts is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01196-w
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the howRwe questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

Mohammad Effatpanah, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Samane Hajiabbasi, Leila Ghamkhar et al.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the howRwe questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

Mohammad Effatpanah, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Samane Hajiabbasi, Leila Ghamkhar, Tim Benson, Mohammad Gholamnezhad, Maryam Ghamkhar, Seyed Yasin Yazdi-Amirkhiz, AmirAli Ghamkhar, Nezam Armand
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The howRwe questionnaire is a brief measure of patient experience that has not been adapted for Persian-speaking populations. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the Persian version of the howRwe questionnaire (P-howRwe). Methodology This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases: translation/cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. Following forward and backward translation, an expert committee reviewed the translated version and produced a pre-final Persian version, which was refined through pilot testing. Psychometric properties were evaluated in 200 inpatients in Tehran, Iran. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 50 patients over a 5- to 7-day interval. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, content validity using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI), and concurrent validity using the Persian SERVQUAL questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis and mirror exploratory factor analysis in two random subsamples. Results The Persian version showed good acceptability, with no reported comprehension difficulties during pre-final testing. The mean total P-howRwe score was 10.62 ± 1.32 (range 1–12). It demonstrated satisfactory reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.84; McDonald’s ω = 0.86; ICC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76–0.85) and strong content validity, as assessed by a panel of 10 experts (CVR = 0.93–1.00; S-CVI/Ave = 0.95). Concurrent validity was supported by a significant positive correlation with Persian SERVQUAL scores ( r = 0.75, p < 0.01). Exploratory factor analysis identified a single factor explaining 69.28% of the total variance, with CR = 0.86 and AVE = 0.63. Mirror exploratory factor analysis in two random subsamples yielded comparable one-factor solutions, supporting structural stability. Conclusions The P-howRwe is a brief, culturally appropriate, and psychometrically sound instrument for assessing patient experience in similar Persian-speaking tertiary inpatient settings. Further validation in other healthcare contexts is warranted.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iran National Science Foundation (IR), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Islamic Azad University of Chalous (IR), Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR), University College London (GB), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.