Learning curve of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Data from a bicentric retrospective study

Background and Objectives: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a promising alternative for managing malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). This study aimed to analyze the learning curve (LC) for EUS-GE. Methods: This retrospective European bicentric study included 96 patients with malignant GOO who underwent EUS-GE (April 2021 to August 2024) using the wireless EUS-guided gastroenterostomy simplified technique (WEST) or modified WEST. The primary outcome was to define the LC for each center through a composite score based on the clinical success rate, severe adverse events (III–IV per the AGREE classification), and procedural time. Secondary outcomes included the technical success rate, length of hospital stay, and resumption/initiation of chemotherapy. Results: A total of 218 consecutive patients with GOO were screened across both centers. Twenty-seven patients were excluded because of surgically altered anatomy and/or benign GOO, leaving 191 patients with malignant GOO in the treatment-flow cohort. Among these, 96 patients underwent EUS-GE (Center 1: n = 53; Center 2: n = 43), whereas 95 patients underwent endoscopic duodenal stenting (Center 1: n = 74; Center 2: n = 21); no patient underwent surgical gastrojejunostomy during the study period. Ninety-six patients (54% women; mean age 68 years) were included. The technical and clinical success rates were 93% ( n = 89/96) and 89% ( n = 80/89), respectively. Severe complications occurred in 6% of patients, with a 1% mortality rate. The main cause of technical failure was misdeployment of the lumen-apposing metal stent, with the distal flange deployed between the stomach and the intestinal wall in 83% of cases ( n = 5). The LC suggested a stabilization phase after approximately 20 procedures/center. The median length of stay was 8 days (IQR 6–10), and 69% (95% CI 55.6–75.6) of patients resumed or initiated chemotherapy. Conclusions: EUS-GE is a complex procedure that, at the team level, appears to reach a stable performance phase after approximately 20 procedures, with high clinical success rates and low complication rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000221
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Learning curve of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Data from a bicentric retrospective study

Fabrice Caillol, Antoine Assaf, Angelica Toppeta, Élodie Romailler et al.
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Learning curve of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Data from a bicentric retrospective study

Fabrice Caillol, Antoine Assaf, Angelica Toppeta, Élodie Romailler, Yanis Dahel, Sébastien Godat, Solène Hoibian, Meddy Dalex, Mariola Marx, Marc Giovannini, Marie Philippart, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Francesco Martini
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a promising alternative for managing malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). This study aimed to analyze the learning curve (LC) for EUS-GE. Methods: This retrospective European bicentric study included 96 patients with malignant GOO who underwent EUS-GE (April 2021 to August 2024) using the wireless EUS-guided gastroenterostomy simplified technique (WEST) or modified WEST. The primary outcome was to define the LC for each center through a composite score based on the clinical success rate, severe adverse events (III–IV per the AGREE classification), and procedural time. Secondary outcomes included the technical success rate, length of hospital stay, and resumption/initiation of chemotherapy. Results: A total of 218 consecutive patients with GOO were screened across both centers. Twenty-seven patients were excluded because of surgically altered anatomy and/or benign GOO, leaving 191 patients with malignant GOO in the treatment-flow cohort. Among these, 96 patients underwent EUS-GE (Center 1: n = 53; Center 2: n = 43), whereas 95 patients underwent endoscopic duodenal stenting (Center 1: n = 74; Center 2: n = 21); no patient underwent surgical gastrojejunostomy during the study period. Ninety-six patients (54% women; mean age 68 years) were included. The technical and clinical success rates were 93% ( n = 89/96) and 89% ( n = 80/89), respectively. Severe complications occurred in 6% of patients, with a 1% mortality rate. The main cause of technical failure was misdeployment of the lumen-apposing metal stent, with the distal flange deployed between the stomach and the intestinal wall in 83% of cases ( n = 5). The LC suggested a stabilization phase after approximately 20 procedures/center. The median length of stay was 8 days (IQR 6–10), and 69% (95% CI 55.6–75.6) of patients resumed or initiated chemotherapy. Conclusions: EUS-GE is a complex procedure that, at the team level, appears to reach a stable performance phase after approximately 20 procedures, with high clinical success rates and low complication rates.

Endoscopic Ultrasound
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.