Artificial Intelligence–predicted Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Progress, Pitfalls, and Path Forward

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied across medical disciplines to enhance clinical decision-making. However, its use in plastic and reconstructive surgery remains early in development. This review consolidates existing literature to evaluate how AI is specifically being implemented to predict breast reconstruction (BR) outcomes, identify current limitations, and outline priorities for clinical translation. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025 that applied AI or machine learning to predict outcomes after BR. Eligible studies were categorized into surgical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes domains and synthesized using a conceptual framework of "progress, pitfalls, and path forward." Results: Of 442 studies identified, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies demonstrated progress in applying AI to predict complications, donor-site morbidity, tissue-expander loss, and patient-reported satisfaction. Three studies highlighted key pitfalls, including limited generalizability due to small, single-center datasets and technical barriers to clinical implementation. Twelve studies focused on future directions, including the prediction of postoperative complications, perfusion-related events, tissue expansion dynamics, and automated aesthetic assessment. Collectively, these findings suggest that AI can model complex, nonlinear relationships among patient, procedural, and aesthetic variables in BR. Conclusions: AI applications in BR are evolving from proof-of-concept toward clinical relevance. Broader validation using multicenter datasets and standardized methodologies will be essential. Collaboration between surgeons and AI engineers will be critical to develop robust, generalizable tools that enhance preoperative planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000008029
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–predicted Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Progress, Pitfalls, and Path Forward

Rijul S Maini, Jesse C. Selber, Jeffrey E. Janis
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Artificial Intelligence–predicted Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Progress, Pitfalls, and Path Forward

Rijul S Maini, Jesse C. Selber, Jeffrey E. Janis
article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied across medical disciplines to enhance clinical decision-making. However, its use in plastic and reconstructive surgery remains early in development. This review consolidates existing literature to evaluate how AI is specifically being implemented to predict breast reconstruction (BR) outcomes, identify current limitations, and outline priorities for clinical translation. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025 that applied AI or machine learning to predict outcomes after BR. Eligible studies were categorized into surgical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes domains and synthesized using a conceptual framework of "progress, pitfalls, and path forward." Results: Of 442 studies identified, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies demonstrated progress in applying AI to predict complications, donor-site morbidity, tissue-expander loss, and patient-reported satisfaction. Three studies highlighted key pitfalls, including limited generalizability due to small, single-center datasets and technical barriers to clinical implementation. Twelve studies focused on future directions, including the prediction of postoperative complications, perfusion-related events, tissue expansion dynamics, and automated aesthetic assessment. Collectively, these findings suggest that AI can model complex, nonlinear relationships among patient, procedural, and aesthetic variables in BR. Conclusions: AI applications in BR are evolving from proof-of-concept toward clinical relevance. Broader validation using multicenter datasets and standardized methodologies will be essential. Collaboration between surgeons and AI engineers will be critical to develop robust, generalizable tools that enhance preoperative planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative outcomes.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 14(9)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Michigan State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.