Feasibility of Privacy-preserving Locally Hosted Language Models for Assessing Medical Student Reflective Writing

Abstract Reflective writing assessment in medical education is labor-intensive and raises data privacy concerns that preclude cloud-based AI solutions. We conducted a feasibility study using a locally-hosted, open-weight large language model (LLM) deployed on institutional servers to assess medical students’ reflective writing. The model evaluated 10 de-identified student narratives using two published rubrics across three independent passes, generating rubric-aligned scores and formative feedback. Scores were consistent across passes and rubrics with no statistically significant differences. Expert faculty rated LLM-generated feedback as meeting most quality criteria (mean 5.48/7). These findings support feasibility of a privacy-preserving, locally-hosted LLM for scalable reflective writing assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02865-7
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of Privacy-preserving Locally Hosted Language Models for Assessing Medical Student Reflective Writing

J. Harry Isaacson, Neil Mehta, Jessica N. Byram, Richard M. Frankel et al.
Medical Science Educator
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Feasibility of Privacy-preserving Locally Hosted Language Models for Assessing Medical Student Reflective Writing

J. Harry Isaacson, Neil Mehta, Jessica N. Byram, Richard M. Frankel, Rick Rejeleene
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reflective writing assessment in medical education is labor-intensive and raises data privacy concerns that preclude cloud-based AI solutions. We conducted a feasibility study using a locally-hosted, open-weight large language model (LLM) deployed on institutional servers to assess medical students’ reflective writing. The model evaluated 10 de-identified student narratives using two published rubrics across three independent passes, generating rubric-aligned scores and formative feedback. Scores were consistent across passes and rubrics with no statistically significant differences. Expert faculty rated LLM-generated feedback as meeting most quality criteria (mean 5.48/7). These findings support feasibility of a privacy-preserving, locally-hosted LLM for scalable reflective writing assessment.

Medical Science Educator
Tufts University (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.