Artificial Intelligence in Academic Research: Adoption, Productivity, and Skill Perceptions

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding across various professional domains, including academia. Yet, limited empirical evidence exists on which academics are adopting AI, how it influences their research productivity, and what implications it holds for their skillsets. Contributing to ongoing debates on the impact of AI on scientific work, this study draws on original data from a recent large-scale survey of Italian academics to explore patterns of AI use, perceived effects on research output, and skill development. Our findings reveal that 39% of respondents report using AI, with significant variation depending on the type of research activity and stage of the research process. AI adoption is more prevalent among younger scholars and those engaged in applied or interdisciplinary research. Overall, AI use is positively associated with higher research productivity and with more favourable expectations about the impact of AI on researchers’ skills. However, the analysis also uncovers nuanced attitudes towards AI: trust in these technologies is not universal, and pockets of scepticism persist across segments of the academic population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103536
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Academic Research: Adoption, Productivity, and Skill Perceptions

Alessandro Muscio, Sotaro Shibayama
Technology in Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence in Academic Research: Adoption, Productivity, and Skill Perceptions

Alessandro Muscio, Sotaro Shibayama
article en

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding across various professional domains, including academia. Yet, limited empirical evidence exists on which academics are adopting AI, how it influences their research productivity, and what implications it holds for their skillsets. Contributing to ongoing debates on the impact of AI on scientific work, this study draws on original data from a recent large-scale survey of Italian academics to explore patterns of AI use, perceived effects on research output, and skill development. Our findings reveal that 39% of respondents report using AI, with significant variation depending on the type of research activity and stage of the research process. AI adoption is more prevalent among younger scholars and those engaged in applied or interdisciplinary research. Overall, AI use is positively associated with higher research productivity and with more favourable expectations about the impact of AI on researchers’ skills. However, the analysis also uncovers nuanced attitudes towards AI: trust in these technologies is not universal, and pockets of scepticism persist across segments of the academic population.

Technology in Society
University of Foggia (IT), Institute for Future Engineering (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Ministero dell'Istruzione e del Merito
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.