Clinical evaluation using first-day assessment of patient suitability for successful performance of deep inspiration breath-hold for breast cancer radiotherapy

Abstract Background Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a radiotherapy standard technique for cardiac-sparing in breast cancer, particularly for left-sided tumors. However, not all patients can successfully complete DIBH RT in clinical routine, necessitating conversion to free breathing (FB) techniques and replanning. This study aimed to identify clinical factors predictive of DIBH feasibility to optimize patient selection and resource utilization. Methods This retrospective study analyzed all patients ( n = 1920) who underwent curative postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy at our institution between May 2020 and December 2024. All patients underwent initial DIBH feasibility assessment and were evaluated for completion of radiotherapy with DIBH or conversion to FB technique. A detailed subanalysis was performed for all patients treated in 2023 ( n = 470). Patient-related factors including age, body mass index (BMI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), pulmonary comorbidities, smoking status, and geometric surface distance between DIBH and FB planning scans were collected for the subanalysis. Results Across the entire cohort (years 2020–2024) of 1,920 patients, 78 replannings (4%) occurred due to conversion from DIBH to free breathing. Increasing age (cut-off of 63 years) was significantly associated with higher replanning rates ( p = 0.001). In the 2023 subanalysis ( n = 470), pulmonary comorbidities ( p = 0.008), higher CCI ( p = 0.044), and a geometric surface distance of below 1 cm between DIBH and FB CT scans ( p = 0.0001) were significant predictors of replanning. The Karnofsky Performance Score, BMI, and smoking status showed no significant association with replanning. Conclusions Age, pulmonary comorbidities, overall comorbidity burden, and insufficient geometric displacement are significant predictors of DIBH failure in breast cancer radiotherapy. These readily available clinical parameters can optimize patient selection algorithms and inform decisions regarding dual CT simulation workflows. A risk-stratified approach incorporating these factors may reduce unnecessary imaging, decrease planning burden, and improve resource allocation while maintaining optimal cardiac protection for appropriate candidates. Clinical trial number The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; registration number: DRKS00038550) on 22 December 2025 ( https://www.drks.de/ ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02919-5
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical evaluation using first-day assessment of patient suitability for successful performance of deep inspiration breath-hold for breast cancer radiotherapy

Jakob Liermann, Eva Meixner, Line Hoeltgen, Nathalie Arians et al.
Radiation Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Clinical evaluation using first-day assessment of patient suitability for successful performance of deep inspiration breath-hold for breast cancer radiotherapy

Jakob Liermann, Eva Meixner, Line Hoeltgen, Nathalie Arians, Juliane Hörner‐Rieber, Vania Batista, Fabian Weykamp, Bahar Cepni, Lars Wessel, Semi Harrabi, Jürgen Debus, Hanna Waldsperger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a radiotherapy standard technique for cardiac-sparing in breast cancer, particularly for left-sided tumors. However, not all patients can successfully complete DIBH RT in clinical routine, necessitating conversion to free breathing (FB) techniques and replanning. This study aimed to identify clinical factors predictive of DIBH feasibility to optimize patient selection and resource utilization. Methods This retrospective study analyzed all patients ( n = 1920) who underwent curative postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy at our institution between May 2020 and December 2024. All patients underwent initial DIBH feasibility assessment and were evaluated for completion of radiotherapy with DIBH or conversion to FB technique. A detailed subanalysis was performed for all patients treated in 2023 ( n = 470). Patient-related factors including age, body mass index (BMI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), pulmonary comorbidities, smoking status, and geometric surface distance between DIBH and FB planning scans were collected for the subanalysis. Results Across the entire cohort (years 2020–2024) of 1,920 patients, 78 replannings (4%) occurred due to conversion from DIBH to free breathing. Increasing age (cut-off of 63 years) was significantly associated with higher replanning rates ( p = 0.001). In the 2023 subanalysis ( n = 470), pulmonary comorbidities ( p = 0.008), higher CCI ( p = 0.044), and a geometric surface distance of below 1 cm between DIBH and FB CT scans ( p = 0.0001) were significant predictors of replanning. The Karnofsky Performance Score, BMI, and smoking status showed no significant association with replanning. Conclusions Age, pulmonary comorbidities, overall comorbidity burden, and insufficient geometric displacement are significant predictors of DIBH failure in breast cancer radiotherapy. These readily available clinical parameters can optimize patient selection algorithms and inform decisions regarding dual CT simulation workflows. A risk-stratified approach incorporating these factors may reduce unnecessary imaging, decrease planning burden, and improve resource allocation while maintaining optimal cardiac protection for appropriate candidates. Clinical trial number The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; registration number: DRKS00038550) on 22 December 2025 ( https://www.drks.de/ ).

Radiation OncologyVol. 21(1)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Heidelberger Institut für Radioonkologie (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.