Natural Selection Drives Codon Usage Bias in the Mitochondrial Genome of Ligula intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1758) Gmelin, 1790 (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea): Insights from Comparative Genomics and Optimal Codon Identification
Codon usage bias (CUB) is a useful indicator of evolutionary forces shaping mitochondrial genomes. Codon usage bias in mitochondrial genomes of Diphyllobothriidae and especially in Ligula intestinalis was characterized. The roles of natural selection and mutation pressure in framing this bias were evaluated on the basis of 12 protein-coding genes in Diphyllobothriidae. The complete mitogenome (13,725 bp) of L. intestinalis comprises 12 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 tRNAs, and two rRNAs, all positioned on the heavy strand, and contains an overall AT content of 66.15%. The mean CAI (0.176), CBI (−0.105), and ENC (45.33) and an evident preference for U-ending codons observed in all examined genes indicate weak CUB. Neutrality, ENC, and PR2 plots consistently demonstrate that natural selection is the predominant force driving CUB and contributes approximately 56% in L. intestinalis and 83% in other Diphyllobothriidea species, with mutation pressure playing a secondary role. Phylogenetic reconstruction supported the monophyly of Diphyllobothriidea, confirmed the paraphyly of Diphyllobothrium as traditionally defined, and placed Ligula and Digramma as sister taxa. These findings clarify the evolutionary constraints governing codon usage in cestode mitogenomes and provide practical resources for codon optimization in heterologous gene expression and genetic studies of this economically important parasite.
Authors
- Zeng Shi-min
- Cui-Lan Hao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2320-4324)
- Cheng Yue
- Shun-Jie WANG
- Shun-Hai Wang
- Feng-Cheng Liu
- Li Zhang
- Jin-Nan Hu
Institutions
- Xinjiang Agricultural University (CN)
- Xinjiang University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Animals
- Published
- 2026-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172723
- Primary Topic
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China