Impact of fully-automated AI based CT-analysis on pre-procedural TAVI planning

Abstract Background Accurate pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) analysis is essential for optimal valve sizing and clinical outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Recently, fully automated, artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT analysis platforms have been developed to simplify and standardize this process. Aims The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical impact of this new analysis method on the selection of valve prosthesis size. Methods Overall, 247 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis were enrolled. Patients underwent TAVI procedures at two different heart centres. The pre-procedural datasets were analysed by a standard TAVI CT-analysis software (3M, Pie Medical Imaging BV, The Netherlands) and a fully-automated CT-analysis-platform employing a deep-learning based algorithm. Key annular measurements and simulated prosthesis size selection were compared between both methods. Results The mean aortic annulus diameter was 24.5 ± 2.3 mm (3mensio) and 24.4 ± 2.4 mm (AI), respectively, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.6 mm and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 2.6%. Annulus perimeter (76.9 ± 7.0 mm vs. 74.6 ± 7.3 mm; MAE: 2.0 mm; MAPE: 2.6%) and annulus area (458.4 ± 87.2 mm 2 vs. 440.9 ± 85.6 mm 2 ; MAE: 21.2 mm 2 ; MAPE: 4.6%) showed excellent correlation (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.95). Prosthesis size selection simulated on the basis of AI-derived measurements would have differed from the implanted size in 21% of patients, compared with 14% when using the semi-automated method. Conclusions In this retrospective study, fully automated AI-based CT analysis demonstrated excellent agreement with conventional semi-automated measurements of the aortic annulus. Nevertheless, similar to established planning workflows, expert interpretation remains crucial to integrate the broader anatomical and clinical context required for optimal prosthesis size selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-03017-y
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of fully-automated AI based CT-analysis on pre-procedural TAVI planning

Philipp Seppelt, Mani Arsalan, Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben, Felix Kreidel et al.
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Impact of fully-automated AI based CT-analysis on pre-procedural TAVI planning

Philipp Seppelt, Mani Arsalan, Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben, Felix Kreidel, Hanna Schneider, Michaela Hell, Martin Geyer, Kerstin Piayda, Tami Duske, Simon Martin, Alexander R. Tamm, David Leistner, Thomas Walther
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) analysis is essential for optimal valve sizing and clinical outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Recently, fully automated, artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT analysis platforms have been developed to simplify and standardize this process. Aims The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical impact of this new analysis method on the selection of valve prosthesis size. Methods Overall, 247 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis were enrolled. Patients underwent TAVI procedures at two different heart centres. The pre-procedural datasets were analysed by a standard TAVI CT-analysis software (3M, Pie Medical Imaging BV, The Netherlands) and a fully-automated CT-analysis-platform employing a deep-learning based algorithm. Key annular measurements and simulated prosthesis size selection were compared between both methods. Results The mean aortic annulus diameter was 24.5 ± 2.3 mm (3mensio) and 24.4 ± 2.4 mm (AI), respectively, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.6 mm and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 2.6%. Annulus perimeter (76.9 ± 7.0 mm vs. 74.6 ± 7.3 mm; MAE: 2.0 mm; MAPE: 2.6%) and annulus area (458.4 ± 87.2 mm 2 vs. 440.9 ± 85.6 mm 2 ; MAE: 21.2 mm 2 ; MAPE: 4.6%) showed excellent correlation (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.95). Prosthesis size selection simulated on the basis of AI-derived measurements would have differed from the implanted size in 21% of patients, compared with 14% when using the semi-automated method. Conclusions In this retrospective study, fully automated AI-based CT analysis demonstrated excellent agreement with conventional semi-automated measurements of the aortic annulus. Nevertheless, similar to established planning workflows, expert interpretation remains crucial to integrate the broader anatomical and clinical context required for optimal prosthesis size selection.

Clinical Research in Cardiology
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Asklepios Klinikum Harburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.