Reliability and Agreement of Digital Caliper and Ultrasound Measurements for Inter-Recti Distance in Postpartum Women

Diastasis Recti Abdominis is a common postpartum condition characterized by separation of the rectus abdominis muscles. Accurate measurement of inter-recti distance (IRD) is important for diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring, but the extent to which digital caliper and ultrasound measurements agree across abdominal sites remains uncertain. This study examined between-visit test–retest reliability within each method, caliper–ultrasound agreement, and associations with palpation at 4.5 cm above the umbilicus, at the umbilicus, and 4.5 cm below the umbilicus. Thirty healthy primiparous women 8–16 weeks after vaginal delivery completed two visits three days apart. Test–retest reliability was good to excellent (absolute-agreement ICC = 0.83–0.98; TE = 0.09–0.25 cm; CV = 2.84–8.28%; MDC = 0.24–0.70 cm). Caliper–ultrasound agreement varied by site and visit (absolute-agreement ICC = 0.72–0.95; TE = 0.12–0.30 cm; CV = 3.89–9.91%). Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) ranged from 0.72 to 0.95, and inter-method minimal detectable change percentages (MDC%) ranged from 10.8% to 27.5%. Caliper values were systematically lower than ultrasound values above the umbilicus by 0.081 cm at Visit 1 and 0.068 cm at Visit 2 (both p = 0.031), while the widest limits of agreement occurred at the umbilicus and below the umbilicus at Visit 1. Visit 1 correlations between palpation and instrument-based measurements were moderate to very strong (Spearman’s ρ = 0.641–0.920). Thus, each instrument was sufficiently stable for repeated assessment under this protocol, but cross-method disagreement was site-dependent, and the data did not permit a definitive judgment of clinical interchangeability without a validated acceptability threshold. Using the same method across follow-up assessments is therefore recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178705
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reliability and Agreement of Digital Caliper and Ultrasound Measurements for Inter-Recti Distance in Postpartum Women

Iva Weingerl, Žiga Kozinc, Nejc Šarabon
Applied Sciences
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Reliability and Agreement of Digital Caliper and Ultrasound Measurements for Inter-Recti Distance in Postpartum Women

Iva Weingerl, Žiga Kozinc, Nejc Šarabon
article en

Abstract

Diastasis Recti Abdominis is a common postpartum condition characterized by separation of the rectus abdominis muscles. Accurate measurement of inter-recti distance (IRD) is important for diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring, but the extent to which digital caliper and ultrasound measurements agree across abdominal sites remains uncertain. This study examined between-visit test–retest reliability within each method, caliper–ultrasound agreement, and associations with palpation at 4.5 cm above the umbilicus, at the umbilicus, and 4.5 cm below the umbilicus. Thirty healthy primiparous women 8–16 weeks after vaginal delivery completed two visits three days apart. Test–retest reliability was good to excellent (absolute-agreement ICC = 0.83–0.98; TE = 0.09–0.25 cm; CV = 2.84–8.28%; MDC = 0.24–0.70 cm). Caliper–ultrasound agreement varied by site and visit (absolute-agreement ICC = 0.72–0.95; TE = 0.12–0.30 cm; CV = 3.89–9.91%). Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) ranged from 0.72 to 0.95, and inter-method minimal detectable change percentages (MDC%) ranged from 10.8% to 27.5%. Caliper values were systematically lower than ultrasound values above the umbilicus by 0.081 cm at Visit 1 and 0.068 cm at Visit 2 (both p = 0.031), while the widest limits of agreement occurred at the umbilicus and below the umbilicus at Visit 1. Visit 1 correlations between palpation and instrument-based measurements were moderate to very strong (Spearman’s ρ = 0.641–0.920). Thus, each instrument was sufficiently stable for repeated assessment under this protocol, but cross-method disagreement was site-dependent, and the data did not permit a definitive judgment of clinical interchangeability without a validated acceptability threshold. Using the same method across follow-up assessments is therefore recommended.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(17)
University of Primorska (SI), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research (AT), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention (AT)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.