Comparative Physicochemical Characterization and Biological Effects of Magnetite- and Maghemite-Based Magnetic Colloidal Suspensions in A704 Renal Cancer Cells

Background/Objectives: Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are investigated in cancer research; however, the direct biological effects of unloaded magnetic colloidal suspensions in renal cancer remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared two double-oleic-acid-coated formulations prepared from precursors: magnetite-based MCS 1 and maghemite-based MCS 2. Methods: The suspensions were characterized by vibrating-sample magnetometry, dynamic light scattering, bright-field scanning transmission electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Their effects on A704 renal adenocarcinoma cells were evaluated after 24 h of exposure to 1–5 µg/mL using MTT, neutral red uptake, JC-1, Hoechst 33342/MitoTracker Red CMXRos, acridine orange/propidium iodide staining, and a 7-day clonogenic assay. Results: MCS 2 showed higher volumetric saturation magnetization (1.541 vs. 1.059 Gs), a smaller Z-average hydrodynamic diameter (79.65 vs. 103.9 nm), and a more uniform volume-weighted distribution. Both formulations significantly reduced metabolic activity and neutral red uptake and induced mitochondrial depolarization, cell-death-associated morphological changes, and impaired clonogenic capacity. MCS 1 generally produced a moderate response with an apparent plateau, whereas MCS 2 showed a pronounced concentration-related effect at 4–5 µg/mL. At 5 µg/mL, MCS 2 reduced metabolic activity to approximately 49%, neutral red uptake to 50.04%, the JC-1 aggregate-to-monomer ratio to 46.02%, and colony formation to 31.44% of the control. Conclusions: The suspensions exhibited distinct physicochemical and biological profiles. MCS 2 produced greater effects at the highest concentrations, potentially related to its smaller hydrodynamic size and more uniform particle-size distribution. Further studies should establish tumor selectivity, cellular uptake, and the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091381
Primary Topic
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Physicochemical Characterization and Biological Effects of Magnetite- and Maghemite-Based Magnetic Colloidal Suspensions in A704 Renal Cancer Cells

Vlad Socoliuc, Elena-Alina Moacă, Robert Ianoş, Emil Radu Iacob et al.
Pharmaceuticals
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
article

Comparative Physicochemical Characterization and Biological Effects of Magnetite- and Maghemite-Based Magnetic Colloidal Suspensions in A704 Renal Cancer Cells

Vlad Socoliuc, Elena-Alina Moacă, Robert Ianoş, Emil Radu Iacob, Roxana Iacob, Lucian Barbu–Tudoran, Călin Marius Popoiu, Mihai Cristian Neagu, Stefan Marcu, Andreea Smeu, DIANA HAJ ALI, Georgiana Boştinaru
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are investigated in cancer research; however, the direct biological effects of unloaded magnetic colloidal suspensions in renal cancer remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared two double-oleic-acid-coated formulations prepared from precursors: magnetite-based MCS 1 and maghemite-based MCS 2. Methods: The suspensions were characterized by vibrating-sample magnetometry, dynamic light scattering, bright-field scanning transmission electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Their effects on A704 renal adenocarcinoma cells were evaluated after 24 h of exposure to 1–5 µg/mL using MTT, neutral red uptake, JC-1, Hoechst 33342/MitoTracker Red CMXRos, acridine orange/propidium iodide staining, and a 7-day clonogenic assay. Results: MCS 2 showed higher volumetric saturation magnetization (1.541 vs. 1.059 Gs), a smaller Z-average hydrodynamic diameter (79.65 vs. 103.9 nm), and a more uniform volume-weighted distribution. Both formulations significantly reduced metabolic activity and neutral red uptake and induced mitochondrial depolarization, cell-death-associated morphological changes, and impaired clonogenic capacity. MCS 1 generally produced a moderate response with an apparent plateau, whereas MCS 2 showed a pronounced concentration-related effect at 4–5 µg/mL. At 5 µg/mL, MCS 2 reduced metabolic activity to approximately 49%, neutral red uptake to 50.04%, the JC-1 aggregate-to-monomer ratio to 46.02%, and colony formation to 31.44% of the control. Conclusions: The suspensions exhibited distinct physicochemical and biological profiles. MCS 2 produced greater effects at the highest concentrations, potentially related to its smaller hydrodynamic size and more uniform particle-size distribution. Further studies should establish tumor selectivity, cellular uptake, and the underlying molecular mechanisms.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 19(9)
Polytechnic University of Timişoara (RO), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), National Institute of Research and Development for Electrochemistry and Condensed (RO), National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies (RO), Romanian Academy (RO)
Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.