Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Structural Validation of the Arabic Fecal Incontinence Score in Egyptian Colorectal Disease Patients

Background/Objectives: Fecal incontinence (FI) is an underrecognized complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal neoplasia that substantially impairs quality of life. This study translated, culturally adapted, and validated the Arabic Vaizey Incontinence Score while evaluating the burden of FI among Egyptian patients. Methods: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, 287 adults with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses were enrolled, including colorectal cancer/precancerous lesions (n = 54), IBD (n = 55), and other/no significant colorectal pathology (n = 178). The questionnaire underwent standardized translation and cultural adaptation. Internal consistency was assessed using McDonald’s omega. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 143) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 144). Results: Patients with IBD had the greatest fecal incontinence burden, with the highest mean Vaizey score (9.24 ± 6.77) compared with patients with colorectal neoplasia (7.28 ± 6.03) and those with other or no significant colorectal pathology (6.68 ± 4.79). Continence-related quality of life was also poorest in IBD (median 8.0 [IQR 4–10] vs. 2.0 [IQR 1–3] and 2.5 [IQR 1–6]). EFA supported a two-factor solution explaining 48.1% of the variance (KMO = 0.691; Bartlett’s χ2 = 298.61, p < 0.001). The inability-to-defer-defecation item showed negligible loading and was excluded. CFA confirmed a refined six-item model with excellent fit (CFI = 0.992, TLI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.088, SRMR = 0.087). McDonald’s omega was 0.825 for Leakage Severity and Management and 0.869 for Functional Impact, with average variance exceeding 0.50 for both domains. Conclusions: The refined six-item Arabic Vaizey Incontinence Score demonstrated good reliability and construct validity. FI score was significantly higher among patients with IBD, supporting routine assessment using this validated instrument across Egyptian patients with colorectal diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord8030051
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Structural Validation of the Arabic Fecal Incontinence Score in Egyptian Colorectal Disease Patients

Rasha Ashmawy, Ehab Kamal, Nourelhoda E. Hassan, Fayek Elkhwsky et al.
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Structural Validation of the Arabic Fecal Incontinence Score in Egyptian Colorectal Disease Patients

Rasha Ashmawy, Ehab Kamal, Nourelhoda E. Hassan, Fayek Elkhwsky, Khaled Abd ElAziz Kamal, Mona Nagy Elwany, Medhat M. Anwar, Sonia S. Saleh
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Fecal incontinence (FI) is an underrecognized complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal neoplasia that substantially impairs quality of life. This study translated, culturally adapted, and validated the Arabic Vaizey Incontinence Score while evaluating the burden of FI among Egyptian patients. Methods: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, 287 adults with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses were enrolled, including colorectal cancer/precancerous lesions (n = 54), IBD (n = 55), and other/no significant colorectal pathology (n = 178). The questionnaire underwent standardized translation and cultural adaptation. Internal consistency was assessed using McDonald’s omega. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 143) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 144). Results: Patients with IBD had the greatest fecal incontinence burden, with the highest mean Vaizey score (9.24 ± 6.77) compared with patients with colorectal neoplasia (7.28 ± 6.03) and those with other or no significant colorectal pathology (6.68 ± 4.79). Continence-related quality of life was also poorest in IBD (median 8.0 [IQR 4–10] vs. 2.0 [IQR 1–3] and 2.5 [IQR 1–6]). EFA supported a two-factor solution explaining 48.1% of the variance (KMO = 0.691; Bartlett’s χ2 = 298.61, p < 0.001). The inability-to-defer-defecation item showed negligible loading and was excluded. CFA confirmed a refined six-item model with excellent fit (CFI = 0.992, TLI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.088, SRMR = 0.087). McDonald’s omega was 0.825 for Leakage Severity and Management and 0.869 for Functional Impact, with average variance exceeding 0.50 for both domains. Conclusions: The refined six-item Arabic Vaizey Incontinence Score demonstrated good reliability and construct validity. FI score was significantly higher among patients with IBD, supporting routine assessment using this validated instrument across Egyptian patients with colorectal diseases.

Gastrointestinal DisordersVol. 8(3)
Ain Shams University (EG), Cairo University (EG), Research Institute of Ophthalmology (EG), National Water Research Center (EG), Ministry of Health and Population (EG), Alexandria University (EG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.