Hot and cold deserts as eco‐evolutionary arenas for understanding plant resistance to multiple abiotic stressors

During their long evolutionary history, land plants have evolved a range of adaptations to different abiotic stressors. These help explain present-day diversity and distribution patterns, as well as the potential resilience of natural and agricultural systems to a changing climate. Most previous research has focused on adaptation to individual stressors and much less is known about how plants deal with exposure to multiple abiotic stressors. Consequently, the evolutionary processes leading to abiotic stress polyresistance (i.e. resistance to multiple abiotic stressors) remain poorly understood. Here, we showcase plants in hot and cold deserts as a compelling system for studying evolution of polyresistance. We focus on three abiotic stressors with substantial physiological overlap - drought, frost and salinity - and present six plant groups that occur in both hot and cold deserts, thus being exposed to these stressors in at least parts of their ranges: Gnetales, Amaranthaceae sensu lato, Nitrariaceae, Poaceae, Tamaricaceae-Frankeniaceae and Zygophyllaceae. We examine key questions regarding the sequence and mechanisms underlying abiotic stress polyresistance evolution and summarize the diverse adaptive strategies that allow persistence under multiple environmental pressures. In doing so, we highlight how trade-offs and facilitation among abiotic stress responses may have influenced the evolutionary pathways that lead to present-day polyresistance. Despite limited evidence, broad patterns emerge for the plant groups examined here, with facilitation appearing especially important, at least during early stages of polyresistance evolution. However, fundamental knowledge gaps remain. Macroevolutionary and macroecological approaches, coupled with historical biogeography and palaeoclimatic and palaeoecological reconstructions, can be used to advance understanding of abiotic stress polyresistance evolution in plants. This will pave the way for applied trait-based research to support climate change mitigation, conservation and sustainable crop improvement in a rapidly changing world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/brv.70207
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hot and cold deserts as eco‐evolutionary arenas for understanding plant resistance to multiple abiotic stressors

Anže Žerdoner Čalasan, Marian Schubert, Catarina Rydin, Olwen M. Grace et al.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Hot and cold deserts as eco‐evolutionary arenas for understanding plant resistance to multiple abiotic stressors

Anže Žerdoner Čalasan, Marian Schubert, Catarina Rydin, Olwen M. Grace, Natasha Barbolini, Marc Fradera‐Soler, Aelys M. Humphreys
article en

Abstract

During their long evolutionary history, land plants have evolved a range of adaptations to different abiotic stressors. These help explain present-day diversity and distribution patterns, as well as the potential resilience of natural and agricultural systems to a changing climate. Most previous research has focused on adaptation to individual stressors and much less is known about how plants deal with exposure to multiple abiotic stressors. Consequently, the evolutionary processes leading to abiotic stress polyresistance (i.e. resistance to multiple abiotic stressors) remain poorly understood. Here, we showcase plants in hot and cold deserts as a compelling system for studying evolution of polyresistance. We focus on three abiotic stressors with substantial physiological overlap - drought, frost and salinity - and present six plant groups that occur in both hot and cold deserts, thus being exposed to these stressors in at least parts of their ranges: Gnetales, Amaranthaceae sensu lato, Nitrariaceae, Poaceae, Tamaricaceae-Frankeniaceae and Zygophyllaceae. We examine key questions regarding the sequence and mechanisms underlying abiotic stress polyresistance evolution and summarize the diverse adaptive strategies that allow persistence under multiple environmental pressures. In doing so, we highlight how trade-offs and facilitation among abiotic stress responses may have influenced the evolutionary pathways that lead to present-day polyresistance. Despite limited evidence, broad patterns emerge for the plant groups examined here, with facilitation appearing especially important, at least during early stages of polyresistance evolution. However, fundamental knowledge gaps remain. Macroevolutionary and macroecological approaches, coupled with historical biogeography and palaeoclimatic and palaeoecological reconstructions, can be used to advance understanding of abiotic stress polyresistance evolution in plants. This will pave the way for applied trait-based research to support climate change mitigation, conservation and sustainable crop improvement in a rapidly changing world.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Stockholm University (SE), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), Bolin Centre for Climate Research (SE), Bavarian Natural History Collections (DE), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Bolincentret för klimatforskning, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.