A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Campus Recreation as Identity Work

Campus recreation research has generated important insight into participation patterns, constraints, service quality, belonging, retention, and student success outcomes. This conceptual paper argues that campus recreation should also be understood as a site of identity work. Drawing from symbolic interactionist and identity theory perspectives, leisure scholarship on identity development in emerging adulthood, and campus recreation research on belonging, comfort, inclusion, and student perceptions, the paper develops a framework for understanding how students negotiate campus recreation in relation to self-concept, social recognition, and possible selves. Five identity work processes are proposed, including identity verification, identity threat, identity experimentation, identity positioning through others, and identity through action. The framework suggests that participation, nonparticipation, and selective engagement are shaped not only by access, motivation, or constraints, but also by how students interpret recreation environments as settings that verify valued identities, threaten them, make possible selves imaginable, and appear socially navigable for enactment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Recreational Sports Journal
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15588661261485259
Primary Topic
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Campus Recreation as Identity Work

Laura Wood, Ryan Snelgrove, Joseph Dick
Recreational Sports Journal
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
article

A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Campus Recreation as Identity Work

Laura Wood, Ryan Snelgrove, Joseph Dick
article en

Abstract

Campus recreation research has generated important insight into participation patterns, constraints, service quality, belonging, retention, and student success outcomes. This conceptual paper argues that campus recreation should also be understood as a site of identity work. Drawing from symbolic interactionist and identity theory perspectives, leisure scholarship on identity development in emerging adulthood, and campus recreation research on belonging, comfort, inclusion, and student perceptions, the paper develops a framework for understanding how students negotiate campus recreation in relation to self-concept, social recognition, and possible selves. Five identity work processes are proposed, including identity verification, identity threat, identity experimentation, identity positioning through others, and identity through action. The framework suggests that participation, nonparticipation, and selective engagement are shaped not only by access, motivation, or constraints, but also by how students interpret recreation environments as settings that verify valued identities, threaten them, make possible selves imaginable, and appear socially navigable for enactment.

Recreational Sports Journal
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.