Food Consumption‐Based Assessment and Related Environmental Sustainability During 1995–2015: Multidimensional Footprints, Synergies, and Trade‐Offs

Abstract The food‐induced environmental impacts are diverse and crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, existing studies focusing primarily on impact quantification may not fully capture environmental sustainability performance, nor adequately reveal policy challenges, trade‐offs, and synergies. This research proposed a consumption‐based assessment framework for food sector environmental sustainability, combining an environmentally extended multi‐regional input–output model with the SDGs scoring method. Food‐related footprints—greenhouse gases (CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O), blue water, land, nitrogen, and phosphorus—were standardized on a 0–100 scale by a multi‐attribute decision making method to construct sub‐indicator and composite scores for cross‐indicator comparison. Correlation analysis was then used to identify potential synergies and trade‐offs among indicators across economies. The results show that, from 1995 to 2015, the per capita water footprint score declined in most economies. Luxembourg and the United States showed relatively lower scores within the analytical framework, with composite scores of 16.22 and below 40, respectively. In addition, several economies exhibited particularly low scores in specific dimensions, such as Belgium in greenhouse gases, Canada in nitrogen and phosphorus, Brazil in phosphorus and greenhouse gases, and India in water. Moreover, at least one significant negative correlation among the seven indicators was identified in South Africa, Mexico, India, Slovenia, Latvia, Germany and Bulgaria, suggesting potential trade‐offs in environmental sustainability. These findings provide a preliminary basis for identifying potential environmental policy priorities, especially in economies where improvements in one environmental dimension may intensify pressure in another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ef007633
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food Consumption‐Based Assessment and Related Environmental Sustainability During 1995–2015: Multidimensional Footprints, Synergies, and Trade‐Offs

Jizhe Li, Zixia Ding, Wenlong Zhou, Bing Wang
Earth s Future
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Food Consumption‐Based Assessment and Related Environmental Sustainability During 1995–2015: Multidimensional Footprints, Synergies, and Trade‐Offs

Jizhe Li, Zixia Ding, Wenlong Zhou, Bing Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The food‐induced environmental impacts are diverse and crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, existing studies focusing primarily on impact quantification may not fully capture environmental sustainability performance, nor adequately reveal policy challenges, trade‐offs, and synergies. This research proposed a consumption‐based assessment framework for food sector environmental sustainability, combining an environmentally extended multi‐regional input–output model with the SDGs scoring method. Food‐related footprints—greenhouse gases (CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O), blue water, land, nitrogen, and phosphorus—were standardized on a 0–100 scale by a multi‐attribute decision making method to construct sub‐indicator and composite scores for cross‐indicator comparison. Correlation analysis was then used to identify potential synergies and trade‐offs among indicators across economies. The results show that, from 1995 to 2015, the per capita water footprint score declined in most economies. Luxembourg and the United States showed relatively lower scores within the analytical framework, with composite scores of 16.22 and below 40, respectively. In addition, several economies exhibited particularly low scores in specific dimensions, such as Belgium in greenhouse gases, Canada in nitrogen and phosphorus, Brazil in phosphorus and greenhouse gases, and India in water. Moreover, at least one significant negative correlation among the seven indicators was identified in South Africa, Mexico, India, Slovenia, Latvia, Germany and Bulgaria, suggesting potential trade‐offs in environmental sustainability. These findings provide a preliminary basis for identifying potential environmental policy priorities, especially in economies where improvements in one environmental dimension may intensify pressure in another.

Earth s FutureVol. 14(9)
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Beijing Municipal Excellent Talents Foundation, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Chinese Academy of Engineering, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.