Simulation of contrasting impacts of dust ice-nucleating particles on the evolution and radiative effects of mixed-phase and ice clouds

Abstract. The effect of aerosols acting as ice-nucleating particles (INPs) remains one of the least understood processes in aerosol–cloud–climate interactions. Mineral dust can serve as INPs in both mixed-phase and ice clouds, yet few studies have simultaneously considered dust INPs in both cloud types, limiting our understanding of their impacts on clouds and radiation. Here, we develop an improved INP parameterization in WRF-Chem that explicitly represents dust INPs in both cloud types, incorporating both non-size-resolved and size-resolved INP parameterizations. Model evaluation against ground-based and satellite observations shows good agreement with the observed spatiotemporal variations of surface PM10, dust INPs, liquid water path (LWP), and ice water path (IWP) over East Asia. Simulations for spring 2018 reveal that dust INPs in mixed-phase clouds accelerate the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen (WBF) process, increasing IWP by 3.2 % and decreasing LWP by 2.9 %, thereby reducing cloud albedo and producing a warming of 0.20 W m−2. In ice clouds, dust INPs enhance heterogeneous nucleation, increase ice crystal number concentrations, and reduce their effective radius. Sedimenting ice crystals from ice clouds further intensify the WBF process in mixed-phase clouds, ultimately yielding a stronger warming of 3.56 W m−2. Differences among INP parameterizations are comparable to those between simulations with and without INPs, whereas the size-resolved scheme may more reasonably represent the spatial variability of dust INP effects. This study highlights the distinct roles of dust INPs in mixed-phase and ice clouds from the microphysical perspective and advances our understanding of aerosol–cloud–climate interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12329-2026
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation of contrasting impacts of dust ice-nucleating particles on the evolution and radiative effects of mixed-phase and ice clouds

Zeng-Rong Dong, Yicong He, Bin Zhao, Zeqi Li et al.
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Simulation of contrasting impacts of dust ice-nucleating particles on the evolution and radiative effects of mixed-phase and ice clouds

Zeng-Rong Dong, Yicong He, Bin Zhao, Zeqi Li, Muyan Peng, Manish Shrivastava, Jonathan H. Jiang, Siyu Chen, Xi Zhao, Dejia Yin, Dantong Liu, Yan Yin, Shuxiao Wang, Hui Jiang, Jingchuan Chen, Jiewen Shen, Da Gao, Shengyue Li, Zhijun Wu, Hua Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The effect of aerosols acting as ice-nucleating particles (INPs) remains one of the least understood processes in aerosol–cloud–climate interactions. Mineral dust can serve as INPs in both mixed-phase and ice clouds, yet few studies have simultaneously considered dust INPs in both cloud types, limiting our understanding of their impacts on clouds and radiation. Here, we develop an improved INP parameterization in WRF-Chem that explicitly represents dust INPs in both cloud types, incorporating both non-size-resolved and size-resolved INP parameterizations. Model evaluation against ground-based and satellite observations shows good agreement with the observed spatiotemporal variations of surface PM10, dust INPs, liquid water path (LWP), and ice water path (IWP) over East Asia. Simulations for spring 2018 reveal that dust INPs in mixed-phase clouds accelerate the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen (WBF) process, increasing IWP by 3.2 % and decreasing LWP by 2.9 %, thereby reducing cloud albedo and producing a warming of 0.20 W m−2. In ice clouds, dust INPs enhance heterogeneous nucleation, increase ice crystal number concentrations, and reduce their effective radius. Sedimenting ice crystals from ice clouds further intensify the WBF process in mixed-phase clouds, ultimately yielding a stronger warming of 3.56 W m−2. Differences among INP parameterizations are comparable to those between simulations with and without INPs, whereas the size-resolved scheme may more reasonably represent the spatial variability of dust INP effects. This study highlights the distinct roles of dust INPs in mixed-phase and ice clouds from the microphysical perspective and advances our understanding of aerosol–cloud–climate interactions.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 26(17)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Tianjin University (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Peking University (CN), Joint Replacement Institute (US), Zhejiang University (CN), Lanzhou University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.