Endoscopic Conical Cap Dilatation: A Novel Alternative to Balloon Dilatation for Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims Esophageal stricture is a common complication after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer, requiring multiple interventions with substantial medical costs. Endoscopic conical cap dilatation is a novel, minimally invasive technique invented by Jinfeng Zhou, but its efficacy and safety compared to conventional endoscopic balloon dilatation remain unclear. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study involving patients who developed esophageal strictures after ESD and underwent either endoscopic conical cap dilatation (n = 32) or endoscopic balloon dilatation (n = 64) between January 2020 and December 2024. The primary outcome was the stricture recurrence rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, number of dilatation sessions, procedure time, dysphagia improvement (Eckardt score), and complication rates. Results The endoscopic conical cap dilatation group had a significantly lower 12-month recurrence rate (22.6% vs. 56.7%, P = 0.002) and required fewer dilatation sessions (median 3 [2–4] vs. 5 [3–7], P < 0.001). Technical success rates were comparable (96.9% vs. 93.8%, P = 0.572). Procedure time was shorter in the endoscopic conical cap dilatation group (median 2 min [1–3] vs. 6 min [3–8], P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant Eckardt score improvement at 1 month (P < 0.001), with no between-group difference (P = 0.326). Complication rates were low (3.1% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.725), with no perforations in the endoscopic conical cap dilatation group. Conclusions This single-center retrospective cohort shows endoscopic conical cap dilatation yields promising preliminary results for post-ESD esophageal strictures, with lower recurrence, fewer sessions and shorter procedures and comparable safety versus balloon dilation. Further large randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2942-4668
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Endoscopic Conical Cap Dilatation: A Novel Alternative to Balloon Dilatation for Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Ying Liu, Min Zhao, Xiaoyin Zhang, Jinfeng Zhou
Endoscopy International Open
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Endoscopic Conical Cap Dilatation: A Novel Alternative to Balloon Dilatation for Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Ying Liu, Min Zhao, Xiaoyin Zhang, Jinfeng Zhou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims Esophageal stricture is a common complication after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer, requiring multiple interventions with substantial medical costs. Endoscopic conical cap dilatation is a novel, minimally invasive technique invented by Jinfeng Zhou, but its efficacy and safety compared to conventional endoscopic balloon dilatation remain unclear. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study involving patients who developed esophageal strictures after ESD and underwent either endoscopic conical cap dilatation (n = 32) or endoscopic balloon dilatation (n = 64) between January 2020 and December 2024. The primary outcome was the stricture recurrence rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, number of dilatation sessions, procedure time, dysphagia improvement (Eckardt score), and complication rates. Results The endoscopic conical cap dilatation group had a significantly lower 12-month recurrence rate (22.6% vs. 56.7%, P = 0.002) and required fewer dilatation sessions (median 3 [2–4] vs. 5 [3–7], P < 0.001). Technical success rates were comparable (96.9% vs. 93.8%, P = 0.572). Procedure time was shorter in the endoscopic conical cap dilatation group (median 2 min [1–3] vs. 6 min [3–8], P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant Eckardt score improvement at 1 month (P < 0.001), with no between-group difference (P = 0.326). Complication rates were low (3.1% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.725), with no perforations in the endoscopic conical cap dilatation group. Conclusions This single-center retrospective cohort shows endoscopic conical cap dilatation yields promising preliminary results for post-ESD esophageal strictures, with lower recurrence, fewer sessions and shorter procedures and comparable safety versus balloon dilation. Further large randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.

Endoscopy International OpenVol. 14(CP)
Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Endoscopic Conical Cap Dilatation: A Novel Alternative to Balloon Dilatation for Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection — Ying Liu, Min Zhao, et al. · Endoscopy International Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS