Response to critics

This response to critics addresses the questions raised throughout the symposium on the various issues raised throughout the Greatest of All Plagues . I address some of Cordelli's concerns about Hobbes's empirical assumptions by turning to Tocqueville. I answer Kirkland's questions regarding the nature of reforms intended to rectify inequality—whether practical or moral. Finally, I address Arlen's objections that the book has focused too much on the moral dimensions of inequality at the possible cost of underemphasizing the dangers of oligarchy. This particular concern provides an opportunity to discuss Walzer's Spheres of Justice and the difficulties of walling off inequality from other spheres of social life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Theory
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851261479205
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response to critics

David Lay Williams
European Journal of Political Theory
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Response to critics

David Lay Williams
article en

Abstract

This response to critics addresses the questions raised throughout the symposium on the various issues raised throughout the Greatest of All Plagues . I address some of Cordelli's concerns about Hobbes's empirical assumptions by turning to Tocqueville. I answer Kirkland's questions regarding the nature of reforms intended to rectify inequality—whether practical or moral. Finally, I address Arlen's objections that the book has focused too much on the moral dimensions of inequality at the possible cost of underemphasizing the dangers of oligarchy. This particular concern provides an opportunity to discuss Walzer's Spheres of Justice and the difficulties of walling off inequality from other spheres of social life.

European Journal of Political Theory
DePaul University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.