David Graeber’s anthropology and historical materialism

This article examines the one thread in David Graeber’s thought that unifies his approach to anthropological knowledge, global history, and political action: his faith in the revolutionary power of the ‘constituent imagination’. The concept refers to the human capacity to collectively imagine alternative forms of social life and bring them into being. Graeber treated it both as a key driver of history and the most viable means to overcome capitalism by way of prefigurative politics. The article illustrates how Graeber turned structuralist anthropology into a myth-busting project aimed at awakening the constituent imagination. It then weighs the charges of idealism that have been levelled at his work, arguing that, to the degree his emphasis on the imagination came at the expense of recognizing class struggle, these charges have bite. Materialist analysis points up gaps in his account of both social change and political action. The article closes with a call to ground Graeber’s startling anthropology of possibilities in the tradition of historical materialism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x261479831
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

David Graeber’s anthropology and historical materialism

Giulio Ongaro
Critique of Anthropology
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

David Graeber’s anthropology and historical materialism

Giulio Ongaro
article en

Abstract

This article examines the one thread in David Graeber’s thought that unifies his approach to anthropological knowledge, global history, and political action: his faith in the revolutionary power of the ‘constituent imagination’. The concept refers to the human capacity to collectively imagine alternative forms of social life and bring them into being. Graeber treated it both as a key driver of history and the most viable means to overcome capitalism by way of prefigurative politics. The article illustrates how Graeber turned structuralist anthropology into a myth-busting project aimed at awakening the constituent imagination. It then weighs the charges of idealism that have been levelled at his work, arguing that, to the degree his emphasis on the imagination came at the expense of recognizing class struggle, these charges have bite. Materialist analysis points up gaps in his account of both social change and political action. The article closes with a call to ground Graeber’s startling anthropology of possibilities in the tradition of historical materialism.

Critique of Anthropology
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.