Patient-centred communication in radiographer education: A five-country comparative document analysis of curriculum and competency standards

INTRODUCTION: Patient-centred communication is fundamental to radiographic practice, particularly when patients experience anxiety or uncertainty during imaging or treatment. However, it remains unclear whether broad communication expectations in radiography education and professional standards are translated into explicit, observable behaviours and integrated into education and assessment. This comparative document analysis examined the representation of patient-centred communication in selected national-level documents from five countries, using listening-related behaviours as an illustrative example. METHODS: Selected national-level curriculum, accreditation, registration, capability, and competency documents from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and Japan were analysed deductively using a predefined extraction framework. The framework assessed communication competence, listening-related behaviours, patient-centred care, patient/family relationships, interprofessional collaboration, education, and assessment. RESULTS: Communication was addressed in all five selected national-level document sets, although institutional framing differed. It was framed as a professional competency or capability in the United Kingdom and Australia, a role-based competency framework in Canada, clinical competency and accreditation requirements in the United States, and primarily as curriculum content in Japan. Explicit observable behavioural expectations, such as listening-related behaviours, were uncommon. Listening was explicitly defined only in the Australian capability standards; elsewhere, it was represented indirectly through broader concepts, such as patient interaction, information gathering, and interpersonal communication. CONCLUSION: The selected documents differed in the explicitness, structure, and educational integration of communication-related standards, without implying differences in education quality or clinical outcomes. Defining patient-centred communication through observable behaviours may strengthen alignment among professional expectations, learning outcomes, feedback, and assessment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Operationalising patient-centred communication as observable behaviours may enhance curriculum mapping, feedback, and assessment in radiographer education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiography
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103553
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-centred communication in radiographer education: A five-country comparative document analysis of curriculum and competency standards

Yoshinori Tanabe, S. Tsudou, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Komatsu et al.
Radiography
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Patient-centred communication in radiographer education: A five-country comparative document analysis of curriculum and competency standards

Yoshinori Tanabe, S. Tsudou, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Komatsu, S. Abe, Y. Chikamoto, K. Tsukano
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient-centred communication is fundamental to radiographic practice, particularly when patients experience anxiety or uncertainty during imaging or treatment. However, it remains unclear whether broad communication expectations in radiography education and professional standards are translated into explicit, observable behaviours and integrated into education and assessment. This comparative document analysis examined the representation of patient-centred communication in selected national-level documents from five countries, using listening-related behaviours as an illustrative example. METHODS: Selected national-level curriculum, accreditation, registration, capability, and competency documents from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and Japan were analysed deductively using a predefined extraction framework. The framework assessed communication competence, listening-related behaviours, patient-centred care, patient/family relationships, interprofessional collaboration, education, and assessment. RESULTS: Communication was addressed in all five selected national-level document sets, although institutional framing differed. It was framed as a professional competency or capability in the United Kingdom and Australia, a role-based competency framework in Canada, clinical competency and accreditation requirements in the United States, and primarily as curriculum content in Japan. Explicit observable behavioural expectations, such as listening-related behaviours, were uncommon. Listening was explicitly defined only in the Australian capability standards; elsewhere, it was represented indirectly through broader concepts, such as patient interaction, information gathering, and interpersonal communication. CONCLUSION: The selected documents differed in the explicitness, structure, and educational integration of communication-related standards, without implying differences in education quality or clinical outcomes. Defining patient-centred communication through observable behaviours may strengthen alignment among professional expectations, learning outcomes, feedback, and assessment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Operationalising patient-centred communication as observable behaviours may enhance curriculum mapping, feedback, and assessment in radiographer education.

RadiographyVol. 32(7)
Okayama University (JP), Independent Sector (US), Okayama University Hospital (JP), Yokohama Rosai Hospital (JP), Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Jikei Institute (JP), Osaka Institute of Technology (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.