Development Timelines of Innovative Drugs in China: A 15‐Year Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Characteristics and Influencing Factors

Timely development and approval of innovative drugs are essential for patient access and public health. China has implemented regulatory reforms, including priority review and conditional approval, to accelerate drug development. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 232 innovative drugs, comprising chemical drugs, biologics, and traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), approved by the National Medical Products Administration during 2010-2025. Development timelines for 227 drugs were analyzed using generalized linear models with a gamma distribution and log link to assess associations with drug type, regulatory pathways, orphan drug status, reform stage, indication, primary endpoint duration, and sample size. Median total development time was 6.94 years (IQR, 4.85-9.97), with biologics having the shortest duration (5.14 years) and TCMs the longest (10.22 years). Drug type and conditional approval were primary variables associated with total development time. Conditional approval was associated with shorter total development time among oncology drugs (relative mean ratio [RMR] = 0.66, p < 0.001), with a significant interaction by indication (RMR = 2.08, p < 0.001). Among drugs not receiving conditional approval, clinical development time was longer in later reform stages by up to 52%, whereas marketing application review time decreased in later reform stages overall, with a 64% reduction in Stage III (RMR = 0.36, p < 0.001). Priority review and conditional approval were associated with 26% and 28% reductions in review time, respectively (both p < 0.05). These findings suggest heterogeneous associations of China's regulatory reforms across pathways and therapeutic areas, consistent with differential contributions of administrative acceleration and evidentiary modification to development timelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70702
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development Timelines of Innovative Drugs in China: A 15‐Year Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Characteristics and Influencing Factors

C R Wang, Meimei Xu, Xinying An
Clinical and Translational Science
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Development Timelines of Innovative Drugs in China: A 15‐Year Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Characteristics and Influencing Factors

C R Wang, Meimei Xu, Xinying An
article en

Abstract

Timely development and approval of innovative drugs are essential for patient access and public health. China has implemented regulatory reforms, including priority review and conditional approval, to accelerate drug development. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 232 innovative drugs, comprising chemical drugs, biologics, and traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), approved by the National Medical Products Administration during 2010-2025. Development timelines for 227 drugs were analyzed using generalized linear models with a gamma distribution and log link to assess associations with drug type, regulatory pathways, orphan drug status, reform stage, indication, primary endpoint duration, and sample size. Median total development time was 6.94 years (IQR, 4.85-9.97), with biologics having the shortest duration (5.14 years) and TCMs the longest (10.22 years). Drug type and conditional approval were primary variables associated with total development time. Conditional approval was associated with shorter total development time among oncology drugs (relative mean ratio [RMR] = 0.66, p < 0.001), with a significant interaction by indication (RMR = 2.08, p < 0.001). Among drugs not receiving conditional approval, clinical development time was longer in later reform stages by up to 52%, whereas marketing application review time decreased in later reform stages overall, with a 64% reduction in Stage III (RMR = 0.36, p < 0.001). Priority review and conditional approval were associated with 26% and 28% reductions in review time, respectively (both p < 0.05). These findings suggest heterogeneous associations of China's regulatory reforms across pathways and therapeutic areas, consistent with differential contributions of administrative acceleration and evidentiary modification to development timelines.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(9)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
National Science and Technology Major Project
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.