Cancer Drug Delivery with Nanoparticles and Biomolecules: Stimuli-Responsive, Theranostic, and AI-Guided Approaches

Cancer remains a major global health challenge, and the limitations of conventional therapies, including systemic toxicity, drug resistance, and poor tumor selectivity, continue to drive the development of advanced nanomedicine strategies. In this context, nanocarriers offer promising opportunities to improve pharmacokinetics, enhance tumor accumulation, and enable controlled or stimuli-responsive drug release. Among them, inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) have gained considerable attention because of their structural stability, tunable surface chemistry, and multifunctional capabilities. Their performance depends on a structure–property–function relationship in which composition, morphology, porosity, degradability, and surface characteristics strongly influence interactions at the nano–bio interface. This review examines the main classes of nanoplatforms currently explored for cancer therapy, including inorganic, polymeric, lipid-based, and hybrid organic–inorganic systems. Particular attention is given to the trade-offs that define each platform in terms of loading capacity, biodegradability, multifunctionality, and translational potential. The discussion also highlights the role of predictive biological models, emphasizing that 3D spheroids, organoids, and organ-on-chip systems provide more realistic insights than conventional 2D assays for evaluating tumor penetration and microenvironment-responsive delivery. In addition, the review considers emerging directions in AI-guided nanoparticle engineerization design and natural-compound-based nanomedicines, both of which are expanding the therapeutic landscape. Overall, the field is moving toward more integrated, application-specific, and clinically translatable nanomedicine platforms capable of addressing the complex biological barriers of cancer treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173729
Primary Topic
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cancer Drug Delivery with Nanoparticles and Biomolecules: Stimuli-Responsive, Theranostic, and AI-Guided Approaches

Viviana Vergaro, Francesca Baldassarre, Giuseppe Ciccarella, Khadija Eddahaoui et al.
Materials
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
article

Cancer Drug Delivery with Nanoparticles and Biomolecules: Stimuli-Responsive, Theranostic, and AI-Guided Approaches

Viviana Vergaro, Francesca Baldassarre, Giuseppe Ciccarella, Khadija Eddahaoui, Chiara Boncristiani
article en

Abstract

Cancer remains a major global health challenge, and the limitations of conventional therapies, including systemic toxicity, drug resistance, and poor tumor selectivity, continue to drive the development of advanced nanomedicine strategies. In this context, nanocarriers offer promising opportunities to improve pharmacokinetics, enhance tumor accumulation, and enable controlled or stimuli-responsive drug release. Among them, inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) have gained considerable attention because of their structural stability, tunable surface chemistry, and multifunctional capabilities. Their performance depends on a structure–property–function relationship in which composition, morphology, porosity, degradability, and surface characteristics strongly influence interactions at the nano–bio interface. This review examines the main classes of nanoplatforms currently explored for cancer therapy, including inorganic, polymeric, lipid-based, and hybrid organic–inorganic systems. Particular attention is given to the trade-offs that define each platform in terms of loading capacity, biodegradability, multifunctionality, and translational potential. The discussion also highlights the role of predictive biological models, emphasizing that 3D spheroids, organoids, and organ-on-chip systems provide more realistic insights than conventional 2D assays for evaluating tumor penetration and microenvironment-responsive delivery. In addition, the review considers emerging directions in AI-guided nanoparticle engineerization design and natural-compound-based nanomedicines, both of which are expanding the therapeutic landscape. Overall, the field is moving toward more integrated, application-specific, and clinically translatable nanomedicine platforms capable of addressing the complex biological barriers of cancer treatment.

MaterialsVol. 19(17)
University of Salento (IT), Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT), National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (IT), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.