Understanding non-participation in a remote exercise trial among breast cancer survivors undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy: a cross-sectional survey

Abstract Purpose Despite wider access to remote/home-based exercise, many breast cancer survivors still decline structured programs. We analyzed the sociodemographic/clinical profile of women on adjuvant endocrine therapy who declined an online exercise intervention and explored their reasons for non-participation. Methods This ancillary cross-sectional survey was nested within a registered parent randomized trial (ReBEC RBR-3tqb39m). Ninety-eight women on adjuvant endocrine therapy were contacted; 25 were not reached. Of the 73 screened, 4 were excluded before randomization and 39 provided written consent and were randomized to supervised online or unsupervised home-based training. The 30 women who declined the intervention were invited to this survey; 21 completed questionnaires covering reasons for non-participation, physical activity (IPAQ), fatigue (FACT-F), and breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life (FACT-B). Decliners were compared with acceptors at baseline. Results Decliners reported significantly higher physical activity levels than acceptors (IPAQ 3108 [1840–5139] vs. 2046 [960–4216] MET-min/week; p = 0.04). A trend toward better fatigue scores was observed in decliners (FACT-F 134 [114–140] vs. 118 [99.5–131]; p = 0.06) while breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life was similar between groups (FACT-B 113 [92–122] vs. 110 [92–118.5]; p = 0.332). The most frequent reasons for declining were already being physically active (52%) and a lack of time for in-person assessments (48%), despite the remote delivery of the program. Sociodemographic variables and endocrine therapy type were not associated with participation. Conclusions Even with remote formats, enrollment may be hindered by perceived physical self-sufficiency and assessment logistics. Tailoring recruitment to individual motivations and offering remote assessment options when possible may enhance program uptake. For women already exercising, recognizing existing routines and providing ways to monitor progress may support effectiveness and sustained benefits. Parent trial registration RBR-3tqb39m (ReBEC).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Sciences for Health
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-026-01924-1
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding non-participation in a remote exercise trial among breast cancer survivors undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy: a cross-sectional survey

Luı́s Otávio Sarian, Miguel Soares Conceição, Henrique Ims Bortolozo, Olívia M. Ruberti et al.
Sport Sciences for Health
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Understanding non-participation in a remote exercise trial among breast cancer survivors undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy: a cross-sectional survey

Luı́s Otávio Sarian, Miguel Soares Conceição, Henrique Ims Bortolozo, Olívia M. Ruberti, Guilherme D. Telles, Sophie Derchain, Valéria L. G. Panissa, Marina L. V. Ferreira, Felipe C. Vechin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Despite wider access to remote/home-based exercise, many breast cancer survivors still decline structured programs. We analyzed the sociodemographic/clinical profile of women on adjuvant endocrine therapy who declined an online exercise intervention and explored their reasons for non-participation. Methods This ancillary cross-sectional survey was nested within a registered parent randomized trial (ReBEC RBR-3tqb39m). Ninety-eight women on adjuvant endocrine therapy were contacted; 25 were not reached. Of the 73 screened, 4 were excluded before randomization and 39 provided written consent and were randomized to supervised online or unsupervised home-based training. The 30 women who declined the intervention were invited to this survey; 21 completed questionnaires covering reasons for non-participation, physical activity (IPAQ), fatigue (FACT-F), and breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life (FACT-B). Decliners were compared with acceptors at baseline. Results Decliners reported significantly higher physical activity levels than acceptors (IPAQ 3108 [1840–5139] vs. 2046 [960–4216] MET-min/week; p = 0.04). A trend toward better fatigue scores was observed in decliners (FACT-F 134 [114–140] vs. 118 [99.5–131]; p = 0.06) while breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life was similar between groups (FACT-B 113 [92–122] vs. 110 [92–118.5]; p = 0.332). The most frequent reasons for declining were already being physically active (52%) and a lack of time for in-person assessments (48%), despite the remote delivery of the program. Sociodemographic variables and endocrine therapy type were not associated with participation. Conclusions Even with remote formats, enrollment may be hindered by perceived physical self-sufficiency and assessment logistics. Tailoring recruitment to individual motivations and offering remote assessment options when possible may enhance program uptake. For women already exercising, recognizing existing routines and providing ways to monitor progress may support effectiveness and sustained benefits. Parent trial registration RBR-3tqb39m (ReBEC).

Sport Sciences for HealthVol. 22(3)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade São Francisco (BR)
Minnesota Lions Vision Foundation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Division of Graduate Education
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.