Do professors with outstanding research performance deliver excellent lectures?: influential dimensions of professorial competence on lecture ratings

This study examines whether outstanding researchers also deliver high-quality lectures at universities. Analysing lecture evaluation data for 24,016 courses offered at P University in Seoul between 2016 and 2019, this study combines quantitative and qualitative methods to explore the relationship between research and teaching. Across multiple quantitative methods of multidimensional scaling, t-tests, and regression analysis, professors with strong research performance show only a limited and field-dependent association with student satisfaction. However, when the analytical focus shifts from general satisfaction at an aggregate level to student competency development, a positive relationship emerges. The study draws three key implications. First, professors with excellent research performance contribute to developing students’ competencies, yet this relationship is not captured when lecture evaluations focus on general satisfaction. Second, for research-active professors to deliver fruitful lectures, an integration of research and teaching must be supported through policy tools like reducing teaching loads and greater autonomy in course design. Third, lecture evaluation systems need to incorporate different dimensions of concepts. The notion of ‘student growth’ captures the contribution effect of professors’ research capacity better than satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Further and Higher Education
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2026.2727924
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do professors with outstanding research performance deliver excellent lectures?: influential dimensions of professorial competence on lecture ratings

Joonha Suh, Jong Soo Lee
Journal of Further and Higher Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Do professors with outstanding research performance deliver excellent lectures?: influential dimensions of professorial competence on lecture ratings

Joonha Suh, Jong Soo Lee
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether outstanding researchers also deliver high-quality lectures at universities. Analysing lecture evaluation data for 24,016 courses offered at P University in Seoul between 2016 and 2019, this study combines quantitative and qualitative methods to explore the relationship between research and teaching. Across multiple quantitative methods of multidimensional scaling, t-tests, and regression analysis, professors with strong research performance show only a limited and field-dependent association with student satisfaction. However, when the analytical focus shifts from general satisfaction at an aggregate level to student competency development, a positive relationship emerges. The study draws three key implications. First, professors with excellent research performance contribute to developing students’ competencies, yet this relationship is not captured when lecture evaluations focus on general satisfaction. Second, for research-active professors to deliver fruitful lectures, an integration of research and teaching must be supported through policy tools like reducing teaching loads and greater autonomy in course design. Third, lecture evaluation systems need to incorporate different dimensions of concepts. The notion of ‘student growth’ captures the contribution effect of professors’ research capacity better than satisfaction.

Journal of Further and Higher Education
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.