International Papillomavirus Society statement on reputed treatments for human papillomavirus infection and human papillomavirus-related diseases: evidence, risks, and standards for clinical evaluation

Human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted infection and the necessary cause of cervical cancer, as well as a proportion of other anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Although most infections clear spontaneously, persistent oncogenic human papillomavirus infection may lead to precancer and cancer. There is therefore a need for effective and globally accessible therapies that either promote sustained clearance of human papillomavirus infection or safely treat human papillomavirus-related lesions, particularly in settings where ablative or excisional procedures are not readily available. However, no therapy has demonstrated proven and durable efficacy in eradicating human papillomavirus infection itself, although some non-ablative interventions have shown efficacy in treating specific human papillomavirus-related lesions. We conducted a narrative review of currently available and emerging interventions promoted for the treatment of human papillomavirus infection or human papillomavirus-related lesions, including approved topical agents, oral formulations, immunotherapies, therapeutic vaccines, molecular inhibitors, and widely marketed commercial products. Evidence was synthesized from clinical trials, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, health technology assessments, and policy recommendations, and assessed using a structured evidence-evaluation framework. Some agents, including immune modulators and sinecatechins, are approved for external anogenital warts but do not reliably eliminate underlying human papillomavirus infection. Selected topical therapies, particularly 5-fluorouracil, have demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in specific clinical contexts, but do not represent validated antiviral eradication therapies. Photodynamic therapy, intralesional immunotherapy, therapeutic vaccines, and molecular inhibitors remain investigational, with insufficient evidence for routine clinical use. Probiotics, nutritional supplements, vaginal gels, and other commercially promoted products also lack robust evidence. In the absence of proven therapies that eradicate human papillomavirus infection, current management relies on surveillance, evidence-based treatment of precancerous lesions, vaccination, and screening. The proposed framework may support professional societies in evaluating emerging interventions and providing clear, evidence-based guidance to health care professionals, policymakers, patients, and the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2026.104950
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

International Papillomavirus Society statement on reputed treatments for human papillomavirus infection and human papillomavirus-related diseases: evidence, risks, and standards for clinical evaluation

Neerja Bhatla, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Κimon Chatzistamatiou, Woo Yin Ling et al.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

International Papillomavirus Society statement on reputed treatments for human papillomavirus infection and human papillomavirus-related diseases: evidence, risks, and standards for clinical evaluation

Neerja Bhatla, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Κimon Chatzistamatiou, Woo Yin Ling, Natalia Maria Rodriguez, Shuk On Annie Leung, Prajakta Adsul, Sarah Feldman, Andreas M. Kaufmann, Julia Brotherton, Chemtai Mungo, F Xavier Bosch, Anna Barbara Moscicki, Nicolas Wentzensen, Suzanne M. Garland
article en

Abstract

Human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted infection and the necessary cause of cervical cancer, as well as a proportion of other anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Although most infections clear spontaneously, persistent oncogenic human papillomavirus infection may lead to precancer and cancer. There is therefore a need for effective and globally accessible therapies that either promote sustained clearance of human papillomavirus infection or safely treat human papillomavirus-related lesions, particularly in settings where ablative or excisional procedures are not readily available. However, no therapy has demonstrated proven and durable efficacy in eradicating human papillomavirus infection itself, although some non-ablative interventions have shown efficacy in treating specific human papillomavirus-related lesions. We conducted a narrative review of currently available and emerging interventions promoted for the treatment of human papillomavirus infection or human papillomavirus-related lesions, including approved topical agents, oral formulations, immunotherapies, therapeutic vaccines, molecular inhibitors, and widely marketed commercial products. Evidence was synthesized from clinical trials, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, health technology assessments, and policy recommendations, and assessed using a structured evidence-evaluation framework. Some agents, including immune modulators and sinecatechins, are approved for external anogenital warts but do not reliably eliminate underlying human papillomavirus infection. Selected topical therapies, particularly 5-fluorouracil, have demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in specific clinical contexts, but do not represent validated antiviral eradication therapies. Photodynamic therapy, intralesional immunotherapy, therapeutic vaccines, and molecular inhibitors remain investigational, with insufficient evidence for routine clinical use. Probiotics, nutritional supplements, vaginal gels, and other commercially promoted products also lack robust evidence. In the absence of proven therapies that eradicate human papillomavirus infection, current management relies on surveillance, evidence-based treatment of precancerous lesions, vaccination, and screening. The proposed framework may support professional societies in evaluating emerging interventions and providing clear, evidence-based guidance to health care professionals, policymakers, patients, and the public.

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Royal Women's Hospital (AU), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Harvard University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of New Mexico (US), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Bethesda University (US), Cancer Institute (WIA) (IN), University of Malaya (MY), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Young Adult Institute (US), Melbourne Health (AU), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), McGill University (CA), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Purdue University, McGill University, Universiti Malaya, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University of California, Los Angeles, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.