Diagnostic Agreement of GLIM Criteria with SGA for Malnutrition in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Background and Objective: Malnutrition significantly contributes to the adverse prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were introduced to standardize malnutrition diagnosis globally. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and agreement of the GLIM criteria compared with the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in non-dialysis CKD patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 248 non-dialysis CKD patients (stages G1-G5) were screened using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). Patients with a score < 3 were classified as well-nourished. Those with a score ≥ 3 underwent GLIM assessment incorporating phenotypic and etiologic parameters. CKD was operationalized as fulfilling the GLIM disease-burden/inflammation etiologic criterion; therefore, GLIM-based prevalence was interpreted in light of this assumption. Concurrently, all patients were assessed using SGA (the reference standard). Diagnostic agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition. Results: The prevalence of malnutrition was 46.8% by SGA and 49.2% by GLIM. The GLIM framework demonstrated substantial agreement with SGA (Kappa = 0.812, P < 0.001). The GLIM criteria exhibited a sensitivity of 87.9%, a specificity of 84.8%, and an AUC of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.818– 0.910). Malnutrition prevalence increased progressively with advanced CKD stages (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that advanced CKD stage, older age, and lower serum albumin were factors independently associated with GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition. Conclusion: The GLIM criteria demonstrate good diagnostic agreement with the SGA in assessing malnutrition among non-dialysis CKD patients. While GLIM provides a standardized and structured framework, longitudinal studies are required to validate its predictive value for clinical outcomes. Keywords: global leadership initiative on malnutrition, subjective global assessment, nutritional risk screening 2002, chronic kidney disease, malnutrition, diagnostic performance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of General Medicine
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s622750
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Diagnostic Agreement of GLIM Criteria with SGA for Malnutrition in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Jing Xue, Lina Yuan, Shuai Chen, Baoli Zhao et al.
International Journal of General Medicine
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Diagnostic Agreement of GLIM Criteria with SGA for Malnutrition in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Jing Xue, Lina Yuan, Shuai Chen, Baoli Zhao, Kaidi Zhang, Lihua Zhao, Caixia Liu, Yicun Xu
article en

Abstract

Background and Objective: Malnutrition significantly contributes to the adverse prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were introduced to standardize malnutrition diagnosis globally. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and agreement of the GLIM criteria compared with the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in non-dialysis CKD patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 248 non-dialysis CKD patients (stages G1-G5) were screened using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). Patients with a score < 3 were classified as well-nourished. Those with a score ≥ 3 underwent GLIM assessment incorporating phenotypic and etiologic parameters. CKD was operationalized as fulfilling the GLIM disease-burden/inflammation etiologic criterion; therefore, GLIM-based prevalence was interpreted in light of this assumption. Concurrently, all patients were assessed using SGA (the reference standard). Diagnostic agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition. Results: The prevalence of malnutrition was 46.8% by SGA and 49.2% by GLIM. The GLIM framework demonstrated substantial agreement with SGA (Kappa = 0.812, P < 0.001). The GLIM criteria exhibited a sensitivity of 87.9%, a specificity of 84.8%, and an AUC of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.818– 0.910). Malnutrition prevalence increased progressively with advanced CKD stages (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that advanced CKD stage, older age, and lower serum albumin were factors independently associated with GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition. Conclusion: The GLIM criteria demonstrate good diagnostic agreement with the SGA in assessing malnutrition among non-dialysis CKD patients. While GLIM provides a standardized and structured framework, longitudinal studies are required to validate its predictive value for clinical outcomes. Keywords: global leadership initiative on malnutrition, subjective global assessment, nutritional risk screening 2002, chronic kidney disease, malnutrition, diagnostic performance

International Journal of General MedicineVol. Volume 19
Hebei Medical University (CN), Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.