Metabolic and Cardiorespiratory Differences in Incremental Upper and Lower-Body Exercise in Healthy Adults—A Cross-Over Trial

Background: Upper-body exercise is increasingly applied in athletic and exercise settings; however, acute physiological and perceptual differences compared to lower-body exercise remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared maximal performance parameters during incremental upper- and lower-body exercise in healthy adults. Methods: Seventeen moderately trained participants (eight females, nine males) completed randomized incremental tests on a hand crank ergometer (HCE) and a cycle ergometer (CE). Maximal fat oxidation (MFO), intensity at maximal fat oxidation (FATmax), peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), maximal heart rate (HRpeak), peak power output (PPO), immediate post-exercise lactate (LApost), and differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPEbreathing and RPEmuscles) were assessed. Results: MFO was significantly lower during HCE compared with CE (0.26 vs. 0.55 g·min−1, p < 0.001), occurring at a lower FATmax (42.6% vs. 51.6% of VO2peak, p = 0.016). Furthermore, relative VO2peak (34.1 vs. 48.9 mL·kg−1·min−1, p < 0.001), HRpeak (178 vs. 189 beats·min−1, p < 0.001), and relative PPO (1.8 vs. 4.1 W·kg−1, p < 0.001) were substantially reduced during HCE. While RPEbreathing was higher during CE (19.1 vs. 17.6, p < 0.001), RPEmuscles (19.4 vs. 19.8, p = 0.111) and LApost (9.8 vs. 8.6 mmol·L−1, p = 0.060) did not differ significantly between modalities. No significant modality-by-sex interactions were observed for any outcome. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate pronounced modality-specific differences in metabolic, cardiorespiratory, and perceptual responses. Exercise modality should therefore be carefully considered when interpreting maximal exercise tests and prescribing training or rehabilitation programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14090383
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolic and Cardiorespiratory Differences in Incremental Upper and Lower-Body Exercise in Healthy Adults—A Cross-Over Trial

Martin Faulhaber, Lorenz Immler, Natalie Marterer
Sports
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Metabolic and Cardiorespiratory Differences in Incremental Upper and Lower-Body Exercise in Healthy Adults—A Cross-Over Trial

Martin Faulhaber, Lorenz Immler, Natalie Marterer
article en

Abstract

Background: Upper-body exercise is increasingly applied in athletic and exercise settings; however, acute physiological and perceptual differences compared to lower-body exercise remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared maximal performance parameters during incremental upper- and lower-body exercise in healthy adults. Methods: Seventeen moderately trained participants (eight females, nine males) completed randomized incremental tests on a hand crank ergometer (HCE) and a cycle ergometer (CE). Maximal fat oxidation (MFO), intensity at maximal fat oxidation (FATmax), peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), maximal heart rate (HRpeak), peak power output (PPO), immediate post-exercise lactate (LApost), and differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPEbreathing and RPEmuscles) were assessed. Results: MFO was significantly lower during HCE compared with CE (0.26 vs. 0.55 g·min−1, p < 0.001), occurring at a lower FATmax (42.6% vs. 51.6% of VO2peak, p = 0.016). Furthermore, relative VO2peak (34.1 vs. 48.9 mL·kg−1·min−1, p < 0.001), HRpeak (178 vs. 189 beats·min−1, p < 0.001), and relative PPO (1.8 vs. 4.1 W·kg−1, p < 0.001) were substantially reduced during HCE. While RPEbreathing was higher during CE (19.1 vs. 17.6, p < 0.001), RPEmuscles (19.4 vs. 19.8, p = 0.111) and LApost (9.8 vs. 8.6 mmol·L−1, p = 0.060) did not differ significantly between modalities. No significant modality-by-sex interactions were observed for any outcome. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate pronounced modality-specific differences in metabolic, cardiorespiratory, and perceptual responses. Exercise modality should therefore be carefully considered when interpreting maximal exercise tests and prescribing training or rehabilitation programs.

SportsVol. 14(9)
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.