The Methodology of Imam Taj al-Din al-Tarawi al-Adarnawi (d. 970 AH) in Presenting Prophetic Hadiths in Jam' al-Anwar fi Lujj al-Afkar wal-Bihar lil-Mu'minin al-Akhyar: Applied Models

This study focuses on examining the methodology of Imam al-Tarawi al-Adarnawi in presenting Prophetic Hadiths in his exegesis titled Jam' al-Anwar fi Lujj al-Afkar wal-Bihar lil-Mu'minin al-Akhyar, clarifying the different levels of the hadiths he cited and explaining his methodology in attributing and judging them. The study relied on two methodologies: the inductive method and the descriptive method. The study concluded the following: Firstly: Imam al-Adarnawī expanded extensively in citing Prophetic ḥadīths in his tafsīr, including authentic ḥadīths of varying levels, as well as fair (ḥasan), weak (ḍaʿīf), and fabricated (mawḍūʿ) narrations. Secondly: Imam al-Adarnawī’s method of attributing Prophetic ḥadīths is characterized by inconsistency, as a clear disparity can be observed between the first half of his tafsīr—where ḥadīths are mostly cited without source attribution—and the second half, in which greater attention is given to identifying the sources of the narrations. Thirdly: Al-Adarnawī does not engage with the technical disciplines of ḥadīth scholarship; he neither clarifies the transmission routes nor the chains of narration, nor does he discuss their continuity or interruption, nor does he address narrator criticism and validation, indicating that such matters were not among his methodological aims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anbar university Journal for Islamic Sciences
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34278/aujis.2026.192226
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Methodology of Imam Taj al-Din al-Tarawi al-Adarnawi (d. 970 AH) in Presenting Prophetic Hadiths in Jam' al-Anwar fi Lujj al-Afkar wal-Bihar lil-Mu'minin al-Akhyar: Applied Models

Bashar Ayman Amin Jarah -, Mohammed Abulhameed Abttan -, Hasan Salem Habshan
Anbar university Journal for Islamic Sciences
Islamic Studies and History
article

The Methodology of Imam Taj al-Din al-Tarawi al-Adarnawi (d. 970 AH) in Presenting Prophetic Hadiths in Jam' al-Anwar fi Lujj al-Afkar wal-Bihar lil-Mu'minin al-Akhyar: Applied Models

Bashar Ayman Amin Jarah -, Mohammed Abulhameed Abttan -, Hasan Salem Habshan
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on examining the methodology of Imam al-Tarawi al-Adarnawi in presenting Prophetic Hadiths in his exegesis titled Jam' al-Anwar fi Lujj al-Afkar wal-Bihar lil-Mu'minin al-Akhyar, clarifying the different levels of the hadiths he cited and explaining his methodology in attributing and judging them. The study relied on two methodologies: the inductive method and the descriptive method. The study concluded the following: Firstly: Imam al-Adarnawī expanded extensively in citing Prophetic ḥadīths in his tafsīr, including authentic ḥadīths of varying levels, as well as fair (ḥasan), weak (ḍaʿīf), and fabricated (mawḍūʿ) narrations. Secondly: Imam al-Adarnawī’s method of attributing Prophetic ḥadīths is characterized by inconsistency, as a clear disparity can be observed between the first half of his tafsīr—where ḥadīths are mostly cited without source attribution—and the second half, in which greater attention is given to identifying the sources of the narrations. Thirdly: Al-Adarnawī does not engage with the technical disciplines of ḥadīth scholarship; he neither clarifies the transmission routes nor the chains of narration, nor does he discuss their continuity or interruption, nor does he address narrator criticism and validation, indicating that such matters were not among his methodological aims.

Anbar university Journal for Islamic SciencesVol. 17(3)
University of Sharjah (AE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.