Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis using Physician Preferences from a Global Discrete Choice Experiment to Investigate the Selection of Preemptive Antiviral Treatments for Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection

Abstract Background A discrete choice experiment (DCE) subsequently incorporated into a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was used to compare clinicians’ trade-offs between the benefits and risks of preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatments posthematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Methods In the DCE, physicians completed forced-choice tasks comparing hypothetical treatments. We used logit models to estimate preference weights, relative attribute importance (RAI) score, and minimum acceptable benefit. The MCDA combined DCE-derived weighted attributes with clinical performance data to compare maribavir versus valganciclovir (using data from the AURORA study) and maribavir versus valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet (using data from multiple sources). Analyses were conducted for 2 cohorts defined by baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1500/mm3 or ≥1500/mm3 at CMV reactivation. Results In the DCE, all 7 attributes significantly impacted physician (n = 377) treatment choices; the most important were administration route/monitoring (RAI score = 25.7%), nephrotoxicity risk (RAI score = 18.5%), grade 3–4 neutropenia risk (RAI score = 18.1%), and week 8 viremia clearance (RAI score = 16.0%). Neutropenia at CMV reactivation significantly reduced physicians’ preference for treatments with a higher grade 3–4 neutropenia risk. In the MCDA, overall benefit–risk scores were higher for maribavir than valganciclovir in both ANC cohorts. Among the considered attributes, the largest positive contributor to the overall benefit–risk score was viremia clearance at week 8, and the largest negative contributor was grade 3–4 neutropenia risk. Maribavir had a higher overall benefit–risk score than ganciclovir and foscarnet in both ANC cohorts. Conclusions Within this MCDA framework, maribavir was preferred over valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet for preemptive treatment of CMV after HCT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag500
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis using Physician Preferences from a Global Discrete Choice Experiment to Investigate the Selection of Preemptive Antiviral Treatments for Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection

Tommi Tervonen, Jessica Auciello, Kimberly Davis, Cristian Gugiu et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis using Physician Preferences from a Global Discrete Choice Experiment to Investigate the Selection of Preemptive Antiviral Treatments for Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection

Tommi Tervonen, Jessica Auciello, Kimberly Davis, Cristian Gugiu, Tien Bo, Jo‐Anne H. Young, Miguel‐Angel Perales, Stéphane Deparis, Jonathan D. Norton, ShunPing Quan, Adel Abou Ali, Victoria L Prince
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A discrete choice experiment (DCE) subsequently incorporated into a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was used to compare clinicians’ trade-offs between the benefits and risks of preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatments posthematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Methods In the DCE, physicians completed forced-choice tasks comparing hypothetical treatments. We used logit models to estimate preference weights, relative attribute importance (RAI) score, and minimum acceptable benefit. The MCDA combined DCE-derived weighted attributes with clinical performance data to compare maribavir versus valganciclovir (using data from the AURORA study) and maribavir versus valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet (using data from multiple sources). Analyses were conducted for 2 cohorts defined by baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1500/mm3 or ≥1500/mm3 at CMV reactivation. Results In the DCE, all 7 attributes significantly impacted physician (n = 377) treatment choices; the most important were administration route/monitoring (RAI score = 25.7%), nephrotoxicity risk (RAI score = 18.5%), grade 3–4 neutropenia risk (RAI score = 18.1%), and week 8 viremia clearance (RAI score = 16.0%). Neutropenia at CMV reactivation significantly reduced physicians’ preference for treatments with a higher grade 3–4 neutropenia risk. In the MCDA, overall benefit–risk scores were higher for maribavir than valganciclovir in both ANC cohorts. Among the considered attributes, the largest positive contributor to the overall benefit–risk score was viremia clearance at week 8, and the largest negative contributor was grade 3–4 neutropenia risk. Maribavir had a higher overall benefit–risk score than ganciclovir and foscarnet in both ANC cohorts. Conclusions Within this MCDA framework, maribavir was preferred over valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet for preemptive treatment of CMV after HCT.

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 13(9)
University of Minnesota (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Cornell University (US), Takeda (United States) (US), Clinical Research Center Kiel (DE)
Takeda Development Center Americas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Incyte, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.