The core of food waste definitions

To prevent food waste, it is important to have a common and consistent definition of the problem. Yet several definitions are currently in use, and they are not fully comparable. Previous attempts to resolve this issue have often added to the confusion by introducing even more definitions. This study, therefore, focuses on finding the core of how food waste is defined in practice, concentrating on areas where definitions agree rather than where they diverge. To do so, a framework with four dimensions central to existing food waste definitions (scope of the food supply chain, final destination, edibility, and solidity) was developed and further explored through a questionnaire with experts in the field. The results indicate that there is a core area of consensus among experts, which aligns with the framework of most food waste definitions. There are also grey zones where experts disagree, and where existing definitions fail to bring enough clarity. With the developed framework, it is possible to further fine-tune existing definitions to bring the clarity needed, and once and for all draw the line between what is a food waste problem and what are adjacent resource inefficiency problems. With these distinctions in hand, food waste reduction as part of sustainable development becomes a more reachable target.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Waste Systems
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2026.100572
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The core of food waste definitions

Felicitas Schneider, Carrie Bradshaw, Niina Sundin, Theodoros Vasileiou et al.
Cleaner Waste Systems
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

The core of food waste definitions

Felicitas Schneider, Carrie Bradshaw, Niina Sundin, Theodoros Vasileiou, Mattias Eriksson, Amanda Sjölund, Christopher Malefors, Rebecca Waterhouse
article en

Abstract

To prevent food waste, it is important to have a common and consistent definition of the problem. Yet several definitions are currently in use, and they are not fully comparable. Previous attempts to resolve this issue have often added to the confusion by introducing even more definitions. This study, therefore, focuses on finding the core of how food waste is defined in practice, concentrating on areas where definitions agree rather than where they diverge. To do so, a framework with four dimensions central to existing food waste definitions (scope of the food supply chain, final destination, edibility, and solidity) was developed and further explored through a questionnaire with experts in the field. The results indicate that there is a core area of consensus among experts, which aligns with the framework of most food waste definitions. There are also grey zones where experts disagree, and where existing definitions fail to bring enough clarity. With the developed framework, it is possible to further fine-tune existing definitions to bring the clarity needed, and once and for all draw the line between what is a food waste problem and what are adjacent resource inefficiency problems. With these distinctions in hand, food waste reduction as part of sustainable development becomes a more reachable target.

Cleaner Waste SystemsVol. 15
University of Leeds (GB), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Skogs- och Jordbrukets Forskningsråd, European Commission, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Research Executive Agency
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.