Reforming dilapidations disputes

Prompted by the Law Commission’s announcement of a scoping project into the maintenance, repair, and upgrading of leased commercial buildings, this paper explores the sorry state of the law on terminal dilapidations claims. It provides an overview of the existing law on damages in this area under Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 19271 and the underlying common law. It identifies a number of flaws in the current regime, both from the perspective of principled coherence and that of commercial pragmatism, not least in light of the huge cost and delay involved in many of these cases. The paper makes the case for the radical proposal of repealing Section 18(1) entirely and allowing the modern law of common law damages to fill the gaps, as it has in closely related areas. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of building survey, appraisal & valuation
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/fasx5699
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforming dilapidations disputes

Guy Fetherstonhaugh, Ashpen Rajah
Journal of building survey, appraisal & valuation
Legal principles and applications
article

Reforming dilapidations disputes

Guy Fetherstonhaugh, Ashpen Rajah
article en

Abstract

Prompted by the Law Commission’s announcement of a scoping project into the maintenance, repair, and upgrading of leased commercial buildings, this paper explores the sorry state of the law on terminal dilapidations claims. It provides an overview of the existing law on damages in this area under Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 19271 and the underlying common law. It identifies a number of flaws in the current regime, both from the perspective of principled coherence and that of commercial pragmatism, not least in light of the huge cost and delay involved in many of these cases. The paper makes the case for the radical proposal of repealing Section 18(1) entirely and allowing the modern law of common law damages to fill the gaps, as it has in closely related areas. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Journal of building survey, appraisal & valuationVol. 15(2)
Victorian Bar (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.