Shear capacity of reinforced concrete one‐way slabs with intermediate support and distributed loading

Abstract Experimental campaigns on reinforced concrete members, being the basis for database evaluations used for validation of many shear design approaches, mostly include simply supported single‐span beams with concentrated loads. Other support and loading conditions representative for actual slab systems are highly underrepresented. Experimental investigations on continuous slabs without shear reinforcement under distributed loading have shown a positive influence on shear capacity not described satisfactorily with current shear design approaches, for example, Eurocode 2. In this paper, an experimental campaign including 10 large‐scale tests on one‐way slabs with distributed load (DL) and varying degrees of rotational restraint is presented. The shear capacities are compared to current shear design codes. The influence of shear slenderness is much less pronounced for the second generation of Eurocode 2 compared to Model Code 2020. Further improvements in considering the beneficial effects of direct load transfer for DL are necessary, especially for members with intermediate support and partial clamping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70758
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shear capacity of reinforced concrete one‐way slabs with intermediate support and distributed loading

Martin Claßen, Josef Hegger, Annkathrin Sinning, Viviane Adam
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Shear capacity of reinforced concrete one‐way slabs with intermediate support and distributed loading

Martin Claßen, Josef Hegger, Annkathrin Sinning, Viviane Adam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Experimental campaigns on reinforced concrete members, being the basis for database evaluations used for validation of many shear design approaches, mostly include simply supported single‐span beams with concentrated loads. Other support and loading conditions representative for actual slab systems are highly underrepresented. Experimental investigations on continuous slabs without shear reinforcement under distributed loading have shown a positive influence on shear capacity not described satisfactorily with current shear design approaches, for example, Eurocode 2. In this paper, an experimental campaign including 10 large‐scale tests on one‐way slabs with distributed load (DL) and varying degrees of rotational restraint is presented. The shear capacities are compared to current shear design codes. The influence of shear slenderness is much less pronounced for the second generation of Eurocode 2 compared to Model Code 2020. Further improvements in considering the beneficial effects of direct load transfer for DL are necessary, especially for members with intermediate support and partial clamping.

Structural Concrete
University of Kassel (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.