The Denominator of Freedom: Local Absoluteness and the Second Amendment

Debates over freedom and control commonly place the two values on a single line and ask which should be greater. This approach, however, treats the scope within which a rule applies and the strength with which it operates inside that scope as the same variable. This paper proposes Local Absoluteness as a normative concept that separates scope from strength. Local Absoluteness is a rule that operates without exception within a domain explicitly defined by subject, act, time, space, and means and publicly justified. Here, 'local' does not mean merely geographical locality; it denotes a specified domain of application. The concept differs from absolutism because its boundary is disclosed and remains open to review and revision, and from relativism because it does not retreat arbitrarily within a justified boundary. The paper applies the concept to the Second Amendment. It separates the end of self-defense from the firearm as a means and analyzes the persistence of firearm operational capacity across time and living environments, the time-judgment dilemma between accuracy of threat assessment and timeliness of defense, and the space-action/access dilemma between responsiveness and access control. The Iron River illustrates a supply pathway in which the place of acquisition and the place of harm diverge; the comparison between Victoria, Australia, and South Korea shows that licensing and legal title can be institutionally separated from routine operational access. The Eighteenth and Twenty-First Amendments and Article V further confirm that constitutional arrangements can be reconsidered through legitimate procedure. The paper specifies, as an independent policy denominator, not legal title itself but routine, unsupervised, immediate operational access outside public duty or strict institutional supervision; within that denominator, it adopts permission at 0, hence control at 100. Authorized shooting and hunting, and public duties, are reviewed under separate denominators with materially different conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22216630
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

The Denominator of Freedom: Local Absoluteness and the Second Amendment

Hyun‐Seop Shin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
preprint

The Denominator of Freedom: Local Absoluteness and the Second Amendment

Hyun‐Seop Shin
preprint en

Abstract

Debates over freedom and control commonly place the two values on a single line and ask which should be greater. This approach, however, treats the scope within which a rule applies and the strength with which it operates inside that scope as the same variable. This paper proposes Local Absoluteness as a normative concept that separates scope from strength. Local Absoluteness is a rule that operates without exception within a domain explicitly defined by subject, act, time, space, and means and publicly justified. Here, 'local' does not mean merely geographical locality; it denotes a specified domain of application. The concept differs from absolutism because its boundary is disclosed and remains open to review and revision, and from relativism because it does not retreat arbitrarily within a justified boundary. The paper applies the concept to the Second Amendment. It separates the end of self-defense from the firearm as a means and analyzes the persistence of firearm operational capacity across time and living environments, the time-judgment dilemma between accuracy of threat assessment and timeliness of defense, and the space-action/access dilemma between responsiveness and access control. The Iron River illustrates a supply pathway in which the place of acquisition and the place of harm diverge; the comparison between Victoria, Australia, and South Korea shows that licensing and legal title can be institutionally separated from routine operational access. The Eighteenth and Twenty-First Amendments and Article V further confirm that constitutional arrangements can be reconsidered through legitimate procedure. The paper specifies, as an independent policy denominator, not legal title itself but routine, unsupervised, immediate operational access outside public duty or strict institutional supervision; within that denominator, it adopts permission at 0, hence control at 100. Authorized shooting and hunting, and public duties, are reviewed under separate denominators with materially different conditions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Denominator of Freedom: Local Absoluteness and the Second Amendment — Hyun‐Seop Shin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS